• HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Oh look, another democracynow article with inflammatory speech, lack of references, one sided information and half the story.

    Chat GP has more content and facts.

    Edit: if you are going to downvote me join the discussion.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      While I’ll grant you this article is more of a stub than anything else, democracynow is a HIGHLY credible source known for factual reporting and has been for years now.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        See, I’ve been following this conflict since it started and I still have no idea if anti Semitic is implying pro Israeli or pro Palestine.

        Because everyone who used it puts it our as an insult and comments have no facts or actual arguement behind them. It seems be be almost a “sentence enhancer” that gets sprinkled on poor comments to give them some flavor and depth.

        So, is democracy now a reputable and unbiased source of accurate information and facts, or is it an option piece that serves to push an agenda?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You were very happy quoting all those articles that manufactured consent for israels Genocide which later turned out to be completely fake. Those were not just loaded with biased language but straight up lied about facts.

          But now Palestinians are really being starved to death by Nazi israel suddenly we’re having a “bias problem”.