• LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ah so the rapists, pedophiles, human traffickers, dredge of perverted society… Those people will suffer.

    Never mind the girls, children, victims of the rapes and coersion and trafficking… They are doing just fine?

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      In the maga mind, the victims dont even register, unless they were told to be offended or concerned, they are unable to have their own thoughts

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    8 days ago

    There is exactly one person’s life that Trump cares about, and that says everything that needs to be said about this topic.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I am absolutely positive that this is a direct result of Elon Musk’s little bitch-fit earlier. He tried playing a card he didn’t hold in his hands. He assumed he did, and then when his bitch-fit didn’t get him anywhere the administration quietly decided to torch any and all evidence and just pretend it never happened. He played a card that Trump didn’t want him to play, and so they took it straight out of his deck in the most blatant-to-anyone-with-two-brain-cells manner possible.

      I thought, before this, that there was a slim possibility – however slim – that Trump merely associated with a child rapist, and Elon was simply pulling a(n admittedly half decent) plausible “gotcha” out of his ass. Now I know with certainty that Trump is a child rapist.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        8 days ago

        With the testimony against Trump from people who claim he raped them when they were children… Let’s just say that if Trump was a Catholic priest, they’d have already moved him to a different country.

  • archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Pedophiles lives. Pedophiles lives will be destroyed. Or people happy to associate and socialize with pedophiles.

    Truth told? I’m not gonna lose a wink of sleep over their lives being destroyed.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 days ago

    How come this logic doesn’t hold water for people who live in poor neighborhoods or areas with gang activity? Or for migrant workers from Mexico?

  • It'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 days ago

    So, you can destroy normal peoples lives, people who’ve paid taxes and followed the law, but rich pedos are above the law, got it. America, you’re cooked.

  • runiq@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    “[Trump] said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein’s conduct. They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another,” O’Reilly began. “If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there’s not going to be any context. The media doesn’t care about context — so you can’t do that. You can’t destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.”

    Oh, yeah, Bill, you’re totally right. Lemme just put down this pitchfork and torch and go right along with NAW I’M JUST KIDDIN EAT THE RICH

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      You can’t destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.

      - Donald “Russia, if you’re listening” fucking Trump

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      Technically, that’s true. A fair bit of investigation would help, but friend Patel isn’t in much of a hurry, now is he? And this was never an issue before either, when it was - say - the Clintons’ heads that were gonna roll, why is that then?

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Maybe if we had a functional government that gave a shit about innocent until proven guilty then this excuse would hold water. They shouldn’t release the files; they should use them as the basis for investigations and eventual prosecutions, because nobody can say for sure if every person on the list is guilty. But we can tell the excuses are bullshit because they’re just gonna sweep it all under the rug and pretend it didn’t happen,

    • notsure@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      …the fact that ASSOCIATION with the name Jeffery Epstein could be tainted is enough, at least for the court of public opinion…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 days ago

    Trump Doesn’t Want to Release Epstein Files Because (rich) People’s Lives Will Be ‘Destroyed,’ inconvenienced with having to spend money on lawyers when a few of their wives divorce them Ex-Fox Host Says

    Real “Brock Turner-ism” happening here. Be sad that some rich people might get in trouble.