• AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      From a report from an anonymous German spy

      "Washing, grooming and changing his linen are things he does rarely, and he likes to get drunk. Though he is often idle for days on end, he will work day and night with tireless endurance when he has a great deal of work to do. He has no fixed times for going to sleep and waking up. He often stays up all night, and then lies down fully clothed on the sofa at midday and sleeps till evening, untroubled by the comings and goings of the whole world. "

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am making my own blunder there and referring to the idea of the “communist state”, I suppose closer to what we understand as socialism, rather than the idealistic communist society which, like you say, is moneyless (and stateless, which immediately separates it from say the USSR or whatever).

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “I feel like criticizing today.”

    “You’ve been criticizing all week Dave, someone has to shovel the cow shit.”

  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s funny how that imaginary Chad Stalin quote implies that you can’t do any of that stuff under capitalism, or that capitalism requires any person to be limited to “one sphere of activity.” In the USA we do have the freedom to choose to do any or all of that, and our only limitations towards doing them all are time and resources.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lots of people have to work 40+ hours just to survive, that doesn’t leave much energy to do things other than your paid job. And you can’t just switch jobs willy nilly, pretty soon nobody would hire you anymore if your cv is full of jobs you’ve only held for a few weeks or months

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That’s not because it’s not a communist society, that’s because our government is run by shills paid by corporations to keep it that way.

        Who runs a communist society? The people? Do we all take turns being president? What happens if it’s a bad dude’s turn and they don’t want to relinquish power?

        The problem isn’t necessarily the economic system, the problem is the leadership appointed, combined with the people’s willful ignorance of their actions. Late-stage capitalism is definitely a problem, but in its current implementation more of a symptom of the points above.

        tl;dr every system suffers from the same vulnerability: shitty people

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Who runs a communist society? The people? Do we all take turns being president? What happens if it’s a bad dude’s turn and they don’t want to relinquish power?

          No one said communism and limits on the government/a constitution are mutually exclusive (If your communist society even has a government, which technically they aren’t supposed to, not that I’ve seen any details on how that is supposed to work).

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If a society is to function people need to be doing the work that isn’t enjoyable as well as the work that’s enjoyable.

    There’s likely not enough people that get genuine enjoyment out of being a garbage man or sewer maintenance worker for a world with everyone doing what they want to work.

    You have to add incentives for the less desirable labour or else the system collapses under its own weight.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The solution capitalism gives us is that those jobs pay less. Any able-bodied person can clean toilets, so supply and demand results in little pay for cleaning toilets. However, those same people deserve a basic human life with food, shelter, and companionship, yet they are easily priced out of this. The “incentive” you speak of is the threat of starvation.

      Communism actually recognizes this. Everyone pitches in to get the basic, necessary work done. This tends to be a lot less than generally expected. Most people today are not doing work that is necessary at all.

      • ben@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In my home town a sanitation worker makes double the provincial minimum wage and gets benefits. That’s an incentive for a job that has a low barrier to entry but undesirable labour.

        The benefit of this system is that you can in fact choose this role instead of being assigned it based on the requirements of society. If the compensation isn’t tempting enough then the employer will increase the compensation until it makes sense. That’s how it’s supposed to work at the very least.

        If the current implementation isn’t working then you address the issues with the implementation, you don’t tear it all down and try something completely different.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s nice. Does it work out that way for jobs with low barriers to entry across the board in your experience?

          • ben@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Depending on the desirability of the work compared to the compensation yes it seems to be working pretty well

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Depending on . . .

              So not depending on if this is a human being who deserves basic food and shelter.

              • ben@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you’re incapable of working then you take advantage of the social safety nets that your government or community provides.

                I never said I was against having supports in place for those who are unable to work?

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’m saying that your support is irrelevant. If you tried to be put them into place, you would be fought by extremely powerful interests. This is the only possible way capitalism could be moral, we’ve tried to do it, and it’s not happening.

                  That’s why we look to throw that system away.

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The USSR gave early retirement to those that worked undesirable jobs, pretty decent incentive. Having undesirable jobs doesn’t make Communism collapse.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The fundamental issue I have with anyone who doesn’t understand communism is the massive authoritarian government it takes to kill the millions of civilians. Wait was that not apart of the books? Weird how it keeps happening then

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The fundamental issue I have with anyone who doesn’t understand capitalism is that it is still directly resulting in mass poverty, starvation, wars for resource robbery, ignored climate crisis but somehow the grand promises of everyone being able to become rich beyond their needs or plausible desires is dangled in front of their eyes while they they are shoved all of the above problems plus pettiest sugar grain up their asses.

      Given how such people can’t even wait 5 minutes in a line or traffic with the physical workings of the efficient and beneficial systems being very apparent, it is not weird how it keeps perpetuating.