• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      How does that thing work btw? Murder is a federal crime as well no? And I remember reading trump’s administration executed bunch of people for murders

      Sorry for being dumb europoor

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The fifth amendment blocks prosecuting people multiple times for the same crime, so state and federal laws are limited to their own jurisdictions. If they’re in state jurisdiction, the state law applies and federal does not. Federal jurisdiction is limited to edge cases like Washington DC, national parks, coastal waters, etc. or crimes that involve crossing state lines.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          crimes that involve crossing state lines.

          Well he did just that. He’s currently in Pennsylvania fighting extradition to New York. Plus he apparently lives in Honolulu, from which he traveled to the “bean counter conference” he knew Thompson would be at.

          That sounds federal enough to me.

          Too bad that the current president considers institutions and norms much more important than the health and happiness of regular people and the incoming one is enthusiastically in favor of and a perpatrator of predatory corporate practices, making the chances of a pardon from either of them literally nonexistent.

          • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Crimes crossing state lines means he would have to kill someone in a different state as well. Committing a crime in one state and then just fleeing to another doesn’t make the case federal.

          • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            At least for murder, that would only apply if the guy was in New Jersey and shot someone in New York with a sniper rifle. For instance, the Unabomber got federal murder charges because he sent his bombs across state lines. The act itself has to cross state lines.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Dual Sovereignty

        Both the Federal and State governments have jurisdiction. If the either the state or federal charges get pardoned or acquitted, the other can also prosecute, double jeopardy rules don’t affect dual sovereignty.

        Edit: The funny thing about this dual soreignty, is that he can get a Jury Nullification on state charges, but then get charged with federal charges and get a different Jury, and this Jury might decide to not nullify and he can still get convicted.

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Technically, its considered different two different “offences”, one is against the State, the other is against the United States of America, even though it may be just one act.

            Oh fun fact. If a single act violates 2 states’ laws, boths states can individually try you for the same act, since they are different “offences” (even tho its the same act). And the federal government can still try your case on top of that. (Although, I don’t know of many instances of doing one act that get you violating 2 states’ laws)

            I agree, it’s bullshit, but the supreme court decided its okay so here we are… sorry, I don’t decide the rules, go argue with the supreme court about it 🤷‍♂️

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      He crossed state lines to commit a crime that could be classified as terrorism.

      Sounds like a federal case to me!

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Or we convince him that it will improve his approval ratings for the election in November, and hope he truly DOES have dementia. Maybe he won’t realize it’s December? Maybe he forgot he’s not running for a 2nd term?

  • gjoel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Or convince him he’s rich, I guess. He just pardoned a bunch of rich despicable people.