

So reading between the lines she thought Trump was on her side but she forgot Trump actually works for Putin. Is that it? Is what is happening here?


So reading between the lines she thought Trump was on her side but she forgot Trump actually works for Putin. Is that it? Is what is happening here?
I got three right.


Removed by mod


Removed by mod


Fun fact Chuck Schumer doesn’t even pretend that he works in favor of his Democratic constituents. No Chuck Schumer’s entire career is based off of serving the needs of the Baileys. A fictional couple he invented that he bases all of his ideals rhetoric and legislation around. They are Republican. Look this up if you never heard before it’s the weirdest fucking thing.


On the very slim chance any of you are shareholders to one of these companies you can always write to the CEO and board warning them that you don’t want your investment put at risk by taking part in what could be a decades-long Insurgency. That you would consider that a violation of their fiduciary responsibilities by putting your shares at risk of major unnecessary losses. Certainly can’t hurt.


Of all people in the world Macron should not be telling anyone how to run a government.
Probably should have robbed him


Removed by mod


Removed by mod


Removed by mod


Removed by mod


I always find it interesting how they talk about history and tradition in these rulings as if bans on open carries haven’t been around since the 1800s.


Not seeing any lies


Removed by mod


What aren’t bizarre way to respond to wishing you a healthy dose of your own dopamine. Aka no, you.
…huh?
Removed by mod