

Who are we kidding that number is outdated at this point. Probably 40% now given the increase in ridiculous bugs.


Who are we kidding that number is outdated at this point. Probably 40% now given the increase in ridiculous bugs.


Checks and balances?
Do you mean check marks on my balance sheet for each billion dollar row?


Soon your OS will get into a never ending loop with the browser and the website.


Ya, that does seem like a fair way to handle something like that.
Is that actually how it happens, or is it typically done internally and decided by a judge/prosecutor/police?


I never said that was enough for lethal force, but there are reasons a cop will shoot someone in the back and it be valid.
You kinda keep dodging what I’m talking about, which is if the person has shown to be a actual threat to the public.
There are rules around it, I just don’t know what that threshold is.
I’m not saying this was met in this case, but I am saying they CAN shoot someone who’s running away in some circumstances. (edit: without having to even be pointing the gun at the cop)
edit: My bad also you aren’t the same person replying to me, so you aren’t repeatedly dodging anything.


Simply possessing a gun absolutely not, but there are rules and exceptions for example on if they have shot at innocent people during the altercation already.
I’m just not sure where that line is, but it does exist.
edit: Like, shooting at innocent people during the alternation might not be enough even, it might need to be shooting at innocent people while fleeing.


Even if there was no gun pointing backwards and he just had the gun, if the person fleeing has shown they are willing to use it, isn’t that enough reason to fear for the saftey of others and take the shot?
I know there’s some line where that becomes okay, but not sure when/where.


You could plug the bluetti into wall power and while there is wall power it runs off that like a UPS.
That setup I believe would also use solar while it was producing, but the moment solar was gone it’d switch to the house power.
If the overall load is more than house power can give via an outlet (you could add a beefier outlet if the bluetti supports higher inputs) it’d start draining the battery.
I dont know if bluettis software says use solar / battery only until battery is 10% kinda thing so this might not be optimized to use solar properly.
Edit: just realized someone else was the one who mentioned bluetti, and not OP, but this is doable with other systems too.


Oh wow I didnt know they switched because of that. Thats amazing! I’ve already got like 20h in the EA release, the game is fantastic.
Edit: the game is even featured on their homepage in the hero section!


I really like how slay the spire 2, one of steams biggest launches ever, is made in Godot.


They were changing their pricing model. It doesnt matter if its a flat cost or per download cost or tierd pricing on a range.
No matter what, unity is getting paid when usage reaches a limit, it was never entirely free at scale.
Customers were ALWAYS paying for unity one way or another, it wasn’t anything new.


Thanks, that’s a really cool site! Echoing the other comment about no YouTube, and also I thought it was hilarious that Spotify was the first option.


Sounds like malware to me?


That is insane lol.
We’ve sold you the rights to include the music in your game.
We have not sold you the rights to sell your game to anyone!


I dunno about that given what another person replied with about threatening someone from singing in a store.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm


Unity never tried that? They wanted to charge the developer using Unity. It was stupid, but they pay for unity one way or another.


The only way I can see this being different is steam shows preview videos of the game which have music.
Amazon often only shows the box it sells in and pictures.
Its still stupid because the game developer has the rights and that page is their place.


Ah yes, the classic dismissal because they claim someone can’t know something if they don’t live there, so they can issue a BLANKET no one can afford it.
There’s was 25.3 million uninsured people in the USA in 2023 but you’re so confident that none of them could ever afford a $2400 treatment.
https://www.kff.org/uninsured/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/
In 2023, of the total uninsured population ages 0 to 64, nearly three in four (73.7%) had at least one full-time worker in their family, and 11.2% had a part-time worker in their family (Figure 4). More than eight in ten (80.9%) uninsured people were in families with incomes below 400% of the federal poverty level
Emphasis mine.
You know what that means? 2/10 had over 400% of the minimum poverty level.
For a single person that would be: $63,840. (5,320/m)
For a couple with no kids, that would be: $86,560 (7213/m)
You don’t think that maybe, these 2/10 people out of 10’s of millions could possibly afford it if needed?
over eight in ten (84%) uninsured adults said they worried that health care costs would put them in debt or increase their existing debt, compared to 71% of adults with insurance (Figure 10).
Hmm interesting, 16% seem to think they could afford something if needed? It seems to line up closely with that 2/10 earning over 400% as well.
That’s more people than many countries have, and more people than many of any given US state.
Like I had around a 1/5 chance of providing useful info to OP when I replied based off this.
Seriously?!?! 😲