• markko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t see how that could realistically happen without whichever company is behind the glasses taking all that juicy biometric data for themselves though.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s up to the govts to protect the rights of the people. If you’re in the US, you’re already on the verge of losing all rights anyway. For the rest of the world, there’s no reason to think we couldn’t regulate it in a reasonably privacy-friendly way. Local face tagging and recognition could work without cloud access, so that you’d only have access to information you keyed in yourself about somebody.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        For the rest of the world, there’s no reason to think we couldn’t regulate it in a reasonably privacy-friendly way.

        You’re totally right in principle.

        But the conversation for this pair of glasses is different, because of Meta.

        If anyone believes that Meta obeys their local laws, please refer them my way for a pyramid business opportunity…(I believe I could easily rip them off, because I believe they are suckers.)

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You act like America is the only place in the world where tech is being used for mass surveillance.

        Your own governments are doing it to you too, whether or not it’s legal.

        Wake up, they don’t give a single fuck about you.