There’s a clear campaign against the mentally ill with the global rise of fascism. Lots of it shows up in anti homeless rhetoric, but you can see it in the MAHA and anti vaccination movements.

There’s no reason to use the word “r-tarded” to describe someone. As someone who’s worked with the intellectually challenged, it’s an insult to them to compare them with people who are willfully ignorant.

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you think “removed” is wrong for degrading people with an actual clinical condition, except for “stupid” which seems to be something like calling that person drunk, I think you shouldn’t stick to those either, because they do the same thing.

        • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I agree entirely, you cracked the code: stop caring, and “removed” won’t be associated with the mentally impaired. People like OP, who care too much, are what keep it a slur used to degrade people with an actual clinical condition.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            As someone who grew up with a very close friend with a sister who has down syndrome who really disliked people using the word as an insult I strongly disagree with you.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              So if I, as an ugly person, dislike people using “ugly” as an insult, should that mean everyone is not allowed to use the word?

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s already considered particularly hateful to insult people based on their appearance as opposed to their actions, so I’m not sure what your point is.

                Also specifically disagreeing with this

                People like OP, who care too much, are what keep it a slur used to degrade people with an actual clinical condition.

                Which is unrelated to what you said so I think you may have misunderstood me. I’m saying that people with down syndrome and people with family members with down syndrome telling people to not use that word as an insult are not degrading themselves/their family member by doing so.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s already considered particularly hateful to insult people based on their appearance as opposed to their actions, so I’m not sure what your point is.

                  Well that’s the thing, the word is not being used to insult people who are actually afflicted with the condition.

                  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Exactly, and that’s already a particularly hateful thing to do that many people have a problem with, so what’s your point? You’re asking me what if you didn’t want people to do it and I’m telling you that’s something many people already don’t want people to do, so the hypothetical doesn’t make sense.