cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15442706

Multiple video reviews analyzed by MeidasTouch revealed that notably missing from the Constitution in Trump’s Bible are the amendments following the Bill of Rights which make up the Constitution’s first 10 amendments. Trump’s Bible jumps from the original Constitution to the Bill of Rights and then to the Pledge of Allegiance, skipping constitutional amendments 11-27.

  • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This headline is technically correct, but it’s clearly meant to cause outrage. The headline “Trump’s Bible only includes the bill of rights” isn’t going to get as much attention.

    Manufacturing outrage obfuscates Trump’s actions that people should actually be outraged about.

      • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        6 months ago

        The headline specifically states those two amendments are omitted because it is the most likely to cause outrage, not because it is the most accurate description of the situation. It’s not incorrect. It’s misleading.

        My county courthouse has a mural of the original constitution and the bill of rights: are they making a political statement by omitting all the other amendments?

        • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          My county courthouse has a mural of the original constitution and the bill of rights: are they making a political statement by omitting all the other amendments?

          Yes.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      To leave certain amendments out of such a lengthy book is very obviously an intentional choice. This is not a case of “we didn’t have space for them”. It’s a case of “we don’t want to present these ones”.