• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Your first part is fair, but your second part is a bit misleading. We sent troops, just not until people were convinced that it was an “us” problem too. People didn’t want to get tangled up in another one of Europes wars. Much like how most of the allies also didn’t get involved until they got threatened too. Except the soviet’s, who had an alliance with them.
    It’s not like providing the materials needed to actually survive is nothing. Our entire economy was repurposed around doing so. The repayment was because a massive “European problem” contingent thought a budget neutral requirement would keep us from helping. We worked out a system where we bought long term leases on land, and they used that cash to buy weapons from us. It was a shell game.

    We got rich after the war because everyone else was rubble and we still had factories.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      We got rich after the war because everyone else was rubble and we still had factories.

      This is it. Most of the wealth* of a nation is real estate (and residential real estate is a very large fraction). Money, including gold or the like, is a very small portion of wealth. Europe’s wealth was literally burned to the ground and blown to smithereens. North America, on the other hand, kept all the wealth it had. So it became wealthier by comparison.

      *I’m talking about wealth here, not income.