The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoThe speed of lightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square107linkfedilinkarrow-up1793arrow-down18
arrow-up1785arrow-down1imageThe speed of lightlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square107linkfedilink
minus-squareUndearius@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoThis got me thinking if we defined the metre to be a more round number, like 1⁄300000000. It would shrink the metre by 0.6918mm. Now I’m curious about what implications that would have.
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 month agoπ would be equal 3. /s Seriously, any metric unit of a quantity involving the dimension “length” would also change its value slightly.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoπ doesn’t have the dimension “length”, it’s a dimensionless scalar
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoI know. I should indicate that with “/s” to make that clear. The “also” refers to anything involving “length” besides the metre itself.
This got me thinking if we defined the metre to be a more round number, like 1⁄300000000.
It would shrink the metre by 0.6918mm.
Now I’m curious about what implications that would have.
π would be equal 3. /s
Seriously, any metric unit of a quantity involving the dimension “length” would also change its value slightly.
π doesn’t have the dimension “length”, it’s a dimensionless scalar
I know. I should indicate that with “/s” to make that clear. The “also” refers to anything involving “length” besides the metre itself.
:)