It’s a movie starring his nephew in the lead role, approved by his estate, and by all accounts it just feels like an attempt to whitewash him. This is a man who was accused of being a serial child molester, settled with a family out of court for $25 million just to avoid a trial (Chandler), and openly admitted he slept in the same bed as kids while he was an adult (Bashir interview), among other things. I don’t really see what there is to debate.
Anything pointing this out gets backlash on movie-related subreddits, which I find wild. It makes me wonder, if Epstein could sing and dance, would he have gotten a biopic too? Would people be defending him like this?
Re “fact” 7 - so he was probably gay. How is that in any way relevant to allegations of child abuse? Unless you’re pushing the homophobic argument that gay men are all pedophiles, and vice versa? How very “woke” of you.
Maybe you’re the one forcing people into neat, categorized boxes. Unlike ~90 percent of men, he apparently didn’t release sexual tension with women, at least not primarily. It’s a simple mathematical elimination of options. So… was this healthy, energetic man fulfilling it with men? Was he asexual? Or were the accusations true? Again, it’s a puzzle piece, not the whole picture…
EDIT: Sure, ignore uncomfortable topics and things you don’t want to believe, independent of the evidence. Just downvote and move on…