return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agoMarco Rubio Is Rebranding the State Department as Explicitly Christiantheintercept.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1256arrow-down16
arrow-up1250arrow-down1external-linkMarco Rubio Is Rebranding the State Department as Explicitly Christiantheintercept.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareradiofreebc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down2·3 days agoThey’re not Christians. They’re criminals.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·3 days agoThey are definitely Christians too. You don’t get to disown them because their existence is inconvenient to you.
minus-squareradiofreebc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoNo. They’re not. They would deport Jesus if he ever returned. They are filled with hate, not love.
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoTheir interpretation of the Bible is exactly as valid as protestants or fucking mormons. All of them are comical delusions meant to control people. There are no differences between the people propping up the vile system of religions.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoSounds like you need to take that up with them then. I suggest you look into the “no true Scotsman” fallacy.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·3 days agoWhat exactly is the difference?
They’re not Christians. They’re criminals.
They are definitely Christians too. You don’t get to disown them because their existence is inconvenient to you.
No. They’re not. They would deport Jesus if he ever returned. They are filled with hate, not love.
Their interpretation of the Bible is exactly as valid as protestants or fucking mormons. All of them are comical delusions meant to control people. There are no differences between the people propping up the vile system of religions.
Sounds like you need to take that up with them then.
I suggest you look into the “no true Scotsman” fallacy.
What exactly is the difference?