The main problem of most developed societies is horribly low fertility rates. Lot of women pick very long education path and then career thinking about having children only in their mid 30s… When their fertility is mostly gone.

I think education system for women should be tailored towards different things than men. Teenage girls should have better knowledge of psychology (especially child psychology) health, childcare ect. so they are well prepared to build strong stable relationships and start families when they’re actually fertile. I’m not talking here about giving up on career of course, it’s a personal choice, but I wish the education was complementary for both genders (so couples benefit from different specializations of each other) rather than uniform.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    17 days ago

    Different profile of education doesn’t mean worse. Just different. I don’t know where “slavery” interpretation comes from.

    • obre@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      Different tracks for different sorts of people, but ultimately similar in outcomes. Separate but equal, right?

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      different profile of education doesn’t mean worse. Just different.

      I can’t tell if you’re trolling me here. That’s literally how whites sold the idea of segregation. And the word “different” in that context is what I was saying about opportunity. When you provide different education to different demographics of people, the levels of opportunity are vastly different for each group. You’re idea of curating a young girl’s education to prepare her for having babies does exactly that.

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m not tolling.

        That’s literally how whites sold the idea of segregation

        And they were lying. I’m not.

        When you provide different education to different demographics of people, the levels of opportunity are vastly different for each group

        Since women can have children, their opportunities are bigger than opportunities of man. Building a family and childcare is an opportunity. Different one than professional career, but it isn’t worse in any way. Many people feel lonely and want a child after decades of work, except the biological clock is ticking unequally faster for women, and it might be too late for some. Somehow you people treat children like an unnecessary burden. This is wrong on so many levels. Promoting and educating women in that direction isn’t a disservice - it opens completely new path… And benefits whole society in current context.

        • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          since women can have children, their opportunities are bigger

          Oh yea because we can all see this has historically been the case thus far lmao

          and they were lying. I’m not

          No one has to worry about if you’re lying. They have to worry about all of the future people who would likely be men that would continue to enforce this.

          I’m sure you have the best intentions here, but it doesn’t matter what your intentions are if you set up something that can easily be abused by countless of other people. On the surface, a literacy test may sound like a good idea for voters, but eventually someone is going to realize that if they put certain demographics of people into a “separate but equal” system of education, then they can control which demographics have more voting power.

          What you’re describing is not far off from what has been experienced in the very near past.