• beep@piefed.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s describing a phenomenon. The image is there only for illustration purposes.

              • Karl@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Idk man, i would rather not have fake images you can’t tell from real ones in my feed.

                Cause: a) It’s AI. AI is proven to be bad for environment. b) Doesnt matter if its shitpost. I won’t mind it too much if it was like a cartoon or something. But when it is a very realistic fake image and you don’t mention it is AI that’s awful

                • beep@piefed.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  To be clear, I don’t know if it’s AI or not. Neither do I care in this context.

                  I am not the original poster.

                  About your trust in photos in your feed that they are real, you shouldn’t trust them.

                  Everything can be generated using AI. your best bet is to verify it yourself in crucial contexts.

                  The top reverse image search tools for me are Google and Yandex. If you can’t verify it yourself than assume the worst.