• Dremor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Do you actually think it’s okay that they had a bot make a press release this hamfisted?

    You are not “saying it sounds like it is written by AI”, you are affirming it is written by an AI. Big difference.
    You affirmation being formated as a question doesn’t change anything, it is a Loaded Question, which tends to be frowned upon.

    • YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Babe I have two eyes, two ears, and a heart that yearns for honesty and knowledge. I know people can sound robotic too, and there are corporate scripts, and autism is a factor, but good lord. If there was an alien wearing human-esque skin suit standing in front of you I don’t think you’d be able to tell it from an actual person and that’s just sad.

      • Dremor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Depending on the definition of “a person”, an alien could be one. What would be your definition of a person ?

        I just pointing out your earlier answer is a loaded question, by definition.

        • YawningNostalgia@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Sure they could be a person. I think dolphins and elephants are people too. You are arguing in bad faith. You can’t tell if a human or AI wrote a press statement and that makes me sad.

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            To be arguing in bad faith would require me to have made an argument, which I did not.
            Other than pointing out the lack of proof of your (badly) hidden argument, I never pretended it to be either LLM speech or human corpo speech. Because there are no proof of either being objectively more likely than the other.

            But you did, using a loaded question, which is written in such way to deny the possibility for it to be human corpo speech, which existed way earlier than LLMs.

            You asked why you were getting downvoted, I anwered with the definition of why. With a link to the definition for you to read so you may improve your “question”.