Nobara OS, Arch Linux and Pop!_OS beat Windows 11 by a slim margin in fps (delta 8) in Windows native games - Cyberpunk 2077, Forspoken, Starfield and The Talos Principle II. Windows 11 wins in Rachet & Clank.

ComputerBase’s testing was done on an all-AMD test rig, featuring a Ryzen 7 5800X (non-3D) and a Radeon RX 6700 XT.

Update: Windows 11 wins in one game.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does it really matter? The majority buy Nvidia due to mindshare, the same probably goes for why they use Windows.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The majority buys NVIDIA, because NVIDIA cards are just better.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least in terms of the latest features, like RTX. If you’re only interested in raster performance, AMD works quite well and provides excellent value.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not just the latest features. NVENC is better for both streaming and untethered VR, CUDA is usually better supported by photo/video/3D/CAD software, etc. AMD is only good if you’re only playing games and can’t afford an NVIDIA card.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or you’re like me and use Linux and value better drivers (e.g. Wayland support, no update bugs on rolling release distros, etc) over those other features.

              And on Windows as well, if you’re buying mid-range, you’re probably not going to have a good experience with those other features, so you should go with AMD. The premium for buying Nvidia at the mid-range often isn’t worth it.

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, I don’t buy midrange, personally. As I tend to use my GPU for hobbies and work, I tend to buy the best thing available on the market.

                And even when I play games, I play in 4K exclusively, for the past seven years :)

    • GustavoM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      More like, “doesn’t matter – not being tracked > all.” :^)

      Even so, Linux is easier to use than Windows (yes, I went there.) because of a single and only fact:

      Configuration files.

      Does the average Windows user can configure EVERYTHING through a SINGLE configuration/text file, that explicitly says “what does what”? Video, sound, window size, hotkeys…?

      No? So there you have it.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows has a configuration file, it’s called a registry. Always has been.

  • icdl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using arch and manjaro for the past 3 years with awesomewm and gnome (can’t get awesomewm to behave with second monitor while gaming so I switch to gnome when using the second monitor, using laptop) and this has pretty much been my experience. Windows is bloated and it never"just works".

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Windows almost always just works.

      This seems crazy to say when talking about Linux. Especially when saying you have to switch to use dual monitors.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Linux allows you to change anything. Like using a WM that’s specifically made for enthusiasts, and developed by random people in their spare time.

        Windows doesn’t allow you to move the taskbar.

        Who’d guess some Linux setups are not going to be plug and play…

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Windows allows you to do anything. If you don’t know how - that’s the problem of your skills.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows never works so much that you have to switch between distros to do different stuff, ahahaha! Oh my, the delusion…