sanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days ago'Obviously collusive': Former judges implore current judge to assert her 'inherent authority' and reject Trump's 'laughable' defenses of 'anti-weaponization fund'lawandcrime.comexternal-linkmessage-square1linkfedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down10
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-link'Obviously collusive': Former judges implore current judge to assert her 'inherent authority' and reject Trump's 'laughable' defenses of 'anti-weaponization fund'lawandcrime.comsanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square1linkfedilink
minus-squared_sepp@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days ago“Plaintiffs have no answer for the fact that the lead Plaintiff, President Trump, directs and controls the Defendants,” the reply goes on. “That alone renders this lawsuit non-adversarial, collusive, and jurisdictionally improper.” Well said. Let’s hope for the best.
“Plaintiffs have no answer for the fact that the lead Plaintiff, President Trump, directs and controls the Defendants,” the reply goes on. “That alone renders this lawsuit non-adversarial, collusive, and jurisdictionally improper.”
Well said. Let’s hope for the best.