• Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just in case anyone’s wondering. The top image is a joke article that was made a while back, not a real product.

    • FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not a joke, he actually did make it. But it’s a custom build, not intended for production, and not intended to actually be used by anyone.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t like the guy either. But it is clearly an art project, never to actually be used.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I figured if anyone was killed by this device it would cause a running mess of cascade lawsuits, even if it served as intended and killed the one who signed the TOS.

    Then consider if the goggles glitched and activated on a false positive or if someone’s kid tried the goggles on for a game.

    This is why piracy deterrent payloads only extend to humiliation or stern warnings (rather than destruction of data or hardware). We can’t restrict activations to perfectly just situations.

    Something to think about as US law enforcement continues to kill Americans at four-plus a day.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What are these tubes? It’s boring. My suicide helmet consists of a VR headset and a Magnum taped to it. It would triger a second after I make one gramatical mistake