• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Six Democrats—Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Donald Davis (N.C.), Jared Golden (Maine), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Mary Peltola (Alaska), and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wa.)—joined with the Republican majority to help pass the measure.

    Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, once again noted her disapproval of a bill that places military spending over “investments in domestic priorities, from education to housing, healthcare to childcare,” as she has in previous years—but the annual Pentagon funding package drew additional ire for its inclusion of amendments related to abortion rights, transgender healthcare, and other culture war battles.

    “For the second year in a row, MAGA House Republicans pursued a path of extremism for the annual Pentagon authorization bill to continue waging their attacks on climate action, reproductive rights, LBGTQ+ rights, and communities of color,” said Jayapal. “This bloated $833 billion Pentagon authorization bill approves $8.6 billion in additional tax dollars for an out-of-control military budget, expanding costly and unnecessary weapons systems while banning gender-affirming care, abortion travel, and diversity efforts for servicemembers.”

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I haven’t looked them up, but I’m guessing most who voted for it are in purple districts and trying to keep their seats.

      But fuck that bill. Their anti-woke war is going to cause a talent drain across the federal government. If my family was living on a base in a state without reproductive protections I’d be looking for a transfer or a new job.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ever notice how moderates claim they have to be more conservative than they want to win elections?

        But to get them to move left it takes someone dragging them publicly left while they kick and scream?

        You never thought that maybe they’re lying and just using republicans as an excuse to be more conservative than Dem.voters want because those moderates get donations from the same people conservatives do?

        • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Far left to far right it’s all a scam. You’ll see people slam a policy and still come up with a reason to vote for that policy. Almost all raise money from the same corporate interests.

          This only gets better with major election finance reform and ethics reform with teeth.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’d love to hear what/who on the “far left” are a scam…

            Because I less you’re using some weird definitions, the “far left” are the only ones fighting for major election finance reform

            • JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Dr. Jill Stein is, I would argue, a scammer. I was interested in the green party, but the more I read about their - and particularly her - positions on some issues and some of the things she claims, she’s either an educated idiot or a grifter. She certainly has some good positions, but also pushes a number of pseudoscience ideas from anti-vax and anti-gmo to scares about “Wi-Fi hurting our kids” (not Internet usage but electromagnetic waves from Wi-Fi). She also pushes Russian propaganda, especially around the Russia-Ukraine war, and has met with Russian officials (including Putin himself) on a number of occasions.
              So unless you’re going to “No True Scotsman” the Green Party as not being leftist, then yes. There are grifters on the left as well. Further, you should avoid assumptions like “there aren’t any bad actors in OUR camp” because grifters and charlatans will find a place in any community should they figure out an effective method to do so, and letting your guard down because “we’re the good guys” is the fastest way to let that happen.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Dr. Jill Stein is, I would argue, a scammer

                That’s what I thought they were thinking…

                Calling the green party is “far left” is exactly why they get funding. So that people think moderates are actually moderate

                The Green party isn’t “left” they’re grifters.

                • JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I agree that the Green Party is a grifting party, but they are the farthest left that has a national stage / ballot access. There are also decent leftists within the Green Party, because they want to affect change at a local level and that’s the closest thing to a party that would represent their views if the DSA doesn’t have a presence.
                  But I think it’s too dismissive to simply write them off as “not left” because at a surface level, they represent several leftist viewpoints, and they’re, unfortunately, a lot of people’s first exposure to leftist politics (especially back in the 2000’s and 2010’s before the DSA started growing). Like yes, they are at this point a grift, but they weren’t always that way and a lot of people aren’t aware that that is the case. They’re “not left” in the same Sense that the Tea Party was “not libertarian” - which is to say that they’re not good-faith proponents of the ideology, but are good at attracting people who don’t know better and have a corrupting effect on the movement.

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That or military districts. It doesn’t matter though, the Republicans had enough votes to pass it on their own, these Dems are, exactly as you say, just playing it safe at home.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sorry, that one’s kinda hard to see without a microscope.
      And there isn’t enough money for microscopes in either budget.