• Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Meanwhile Americans are just fine with a pedophile rapist spending their taxes on god knows what as he removes their rights.

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Oh boy. Here come the angry Americans.

      ‘Akshully we voted and wrote some letters so we tried. You know how hard it is to actually do something? Its, like, really hard. I havent been personally shot yet so its really not that bad anyway.’

  • MasutaHarada@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I almost lost count whenever france decide enough is enough, bringing their ol reliable to detach someone body part, figure it doesn’t work in long term huh.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Last time this happened? You aren’t talking about the revolution right? Because that certainly wasn’t the last time it’s happened.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    the first time, people were hungrier and more determined to unseat the existing leadership. this group today appears to be more amenable to working with the existing leadership by comparison

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s was more about the parallels of French students trying to start a revolution, not necessary the specifics of what they stormed and when.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 day ago

    Paris has been redesigned in the XIXth century to contain revolts: the wide avenues are hard to block with barricades , and in straight line, so it’s always visible from the main police barracks that are located on the big squares at each end. Also, since 1930, almost all strikes have to use the same route between 3 places: Republique, Bastille and Nation.

    So basically, we’ve been storming the Bastille weekly for 2 centuries.

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Are you saying we don’t protest? Because I’ve been to 4 protests this year and was suppressed by police at 2 of them. What am I taking note of? The fact that so many people on here get a hate boner for Americans just as much as they do for Trump?

      God I’m so fucking sick of this attitude. Americans are trying to fix this. How about you go get maced and shot at by the police and then tell me how much you want to do it again? I have a sneaking suspicion that the vast majority of people with your attitude would turn tail or stay home in our exact situation.

      • jambudz@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Americans protest when it’s convenient (for the most part). The biggest evidence of that is the no kings protests. Doesn’t interfere with work or business. A true protest would do actual damage because of the lack of work being performed for the owner class.

        • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          A quarter of the working age population is functionally unemployed. They can’t afford to protest the way you want or they won’t eat, will lose their housing because there’s no social safety nets. Of the few that existed those were some of the first things to go.

          Americans could petition their government representation to fix that but that representation either doesn’t care or has no power in the current system.

          What you’re talking about would be, essentially, a siege with each side trying to wait out the other; and that’s assuming you could get enough people together.

          Let’s compare France, a country known for protest, with the US:

          • France population ~70 million

          • US population ~340 million

          • France size ~551,000km squared

          • US size ~9,900,000km squared

          With just those two numbers we can see that France’s population is ~1/5th of the US in a country roughly 1/18th the size of the US. That’s without getting into the transportation options that are available in France that aren’t available in the US to get people to the seat of power.

          There has been an ongoing campaign to weaken the power of the citizens of the US for decades and that’s not the only place. Fascism is on the rise globally.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    We DONT have Enough MONEY for Teachers! We spent ALL that Money on SHOOTING CHILDREN IN THE FACE instead!

    -LITERALLY The French Government!

    • kossa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yep. I like how the general consensus in society is “don’t beat your children, that’ll teach them wrongly”. Meanwhile the government out and about beating up all the children, who just ask for a better future 👍. That’ll teach them the right lessons, I guess.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    But MAGA keeps telling me France has burned entirely to the ground because of Muslims! They wouldn’t be saying that just to promote Islamophobia and racism, would they? /s

      • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        US protesters: hold up a sign saying “We’re angry” French protesters: are angry

        We are not the same.

      • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you have any idea how protests in France work? Size is not what counts. They will burn down the whole city if it has to be. Garbage cans and cars regularly get ignited and flipped over. Pure chaos in the whole city for DAYS, if not weeks, not just a couple hours. And they are all ready to answer police with violence, if they are violent towards the people.

        No Kings etc is just a nice get together with a bit of cosplay.

        (of course I am exaggerating a little bit, but don’t ever compare US protests to French protests)

        • tene@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 day ago

          don’t ever compare US protests to french protests

          Why not? Having been at both, I will compare them (out of spite)

          I agree that french protests are generally more intense, we have witnessed similarities in the recent protests (in Minneapolis for example).

          Spontaneous upheaval, organized response to police brutality, occupation of large avenues and city cultural trademarks, property damage…

          I do feel that there is a lack of class cohesion and solidarity in the US protests, response to police crowd control isn’t as good, groups of ultras are few and unorganized, protests don’t last as long and aren’t discussed in public opinion as often, there isn’t as many meaningful chants (or enthusiasm when chanting them) and last but not least, it’s way harder for the protest to have a meaningful impact on a city’s normal operations because they’re so damn big

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes look at Minneapolis it is possible in America people just don’t want to.

        • WizardOfFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          For Americans, doing the protest is an end in itself. They’re a way for comfortable white liberals to telegraph that they’re “on the right side” and “the good ones” so that they can return to doing nothing after a few hours of waving signs around and posting photos.

          There is never any plan to escalate, never any thought to what happens if their demands aren’t met. The US does parades. Bring the kids, it’ll be fun- you can LARP participation in democracy.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            And have more people and most people live in cities so what is your point.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      Debatable. The people of France gained more liberties than anyone else in contental Europe at the time. Feudal rights abolished, internal trade barriers stripped away, eventually the best law code the world had seen to that point, etc… It was overwhelmingly positive for the people of France long-term.

      • inari@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Long-term, sure, but they quickly lost most of their gains in the short and medium term when Napoleon restored the monarchy.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not at all. Napoleon’s Empire was extremely enlightened compared to the ancient regime they had been laboring under. He’s the one that implemented said law code for instance. It wasn’t a republic but in a lot of way Napoleon’s reign is what cemented the gains of the Revolution. The institution that made them permanent and helped to forge the concept of the nation of France.

          Also don’t forget that Napoleon overthrew the dictatorship of the Directory that itself had overthrown the Revolution.

          • Not_Dav3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The Directory was dysfunctional but not a dictatorship. I mean, what kind of dictatorship cuts the executive power five ways?

            Napoleon’s reign is a mixed bag. He did cement some of the gains of the Revolution but it still wasn’t a good time to be a woman or a former slave.

            • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Worse than in other countries? Serious question. Women seemed implicated in the revolution a lot for example (not always in a good way). Maybe it freed the mind of people.

              • Not_Dav3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                From the Wikipedia page “Women in the French Revolution”:

                “Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. These women demanded equality for women and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination. Their chief vehicle for agitation were pamphlets and women’s clubs. The Jacobin element in power abolished all the women’s clubs in October 1793 and arrested their leaders. The movement was crushed. Devance explains the decision in terms of the emphasis on masculinity in wartime, Marie Antoinette’s bad reputation for feminine interference in state affairs, and traditional male supremacy. A decade later the Napoleonic Code confirmed and perpetuated women’s second-class status.”

                And to expand on that last sentence on the Napoleonic Code:

                “With regard to family, the code established the supremacy of the husband over his wife and children, the status quo in Europe at the time. Women had even fewer rights than children. Divorce by mutual consent was abolished in 1804.”

          • menas@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, Napoleon was a tyran and retcon a lot of liberty ; slavery, antisemitic laws, for example. The only legacy of Napoleon that matter is his own propaganda that still exist in France. I would bet that you’ve followed a French education