Sure, the simplest explanation is that if you think Stalin was unelected or had unlimited power, or that Mao was a dictator for whom everyone contemporary to him unquestioningly followed, you fell for nazi propaganda.
And I said none of that nor do I believe any of it, so is it safe to say you’re having a big fat juicy straw-man with the rest of your comment and I can skip it?
Is it also safe to say the implied attack on me that I love either that or Hitler is a pretty ridiculous way to enter this thread?
The term ‘violent authoritarian communism’ is an oxymoron and did not ever exist, it is an example of nazi propaganda. Just as the other things I listed, which are inherent to the beliefs that would be inferred from someone writing ‘violent authoritarian communism.’
I’m sorry AI has rotted your brain past the point of basic English skills, but I hope you get better in the future comrade so that some day you may be smart enough to be a socialist.
The term ‘violent authoritarian communism’ is an oxymoron and did not ever exist
Ah okay, then this discussion is over. Sorry to hear you’ve been brainwashed, but I doubt I can fix it today.
At a guess, you’re probably one of those “No True Communism” types that believes when communism is hijacked by violent authoritarians it doesn’t count.
That or you think the Holodomor, Stalin’s Great Purge, and The Great Leap Forward were just myths.
You can keep attacking my literacy with no cause if it makes you feel better, but I think I touched a nerve by identifying your beliefs and rejecting them.
Speaking of reading, here’s some you should probably do:
And I said none of that nor do I believe any of it, so is it safe to say you’re having a big fat juicy straw-man with the rest of your comment and I can skip it?
Is it also safe to say the implied attack on me that I love either that or Hitler is a pretty ridiculous way to enter this thread?
I don’t know if this is a reading comprehension issue, a logic issue, or you’re just arguing in bad faith but I’m growing tired of your game.
The term ‘violent authoritarian communism’ is an oxymoron and did not ever exist, it is an example of nazi propaganda. Just as the other things I listed, which are inherent to the beliefs that would be inferred from someone writing ‘violent authoritarian communism.’
I’m sorry AI has rotted your brain past the point of basic English skills, but I hope you get better in the future comrade so that some day you may be smart enough to be a socialist.
Ah okay, then this discussion is over. Sorry to hear you’ve been brainwashed, but I doubt I can fix it today.
At a guess, you’re probably one of those “No True Communism” types that believes when communism is hijacked by violent authoritarians it doesn’t count.
That or you think the Holodomor, Stalin’s Great Purge, and The Great Leap Forward were just myths.
I don’t really care to find out which.
You really have the reading comprehension of a child. There were farmers in agrarian China that could read better than you.
You can keep attacking my literacy with no cause if it makes you feel better, but I think I touched a nerve by identifying your beliefs and rejecting them.
Speaking of reading, here’s some you should probably do:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem