In November 2015, world leaders descended on Paris to negotiate a historic agreement to limit global warming. But on the summit’s opening day, attention turned to a private citizen slouched awkwardly in a chair on stage: Bill Gates.
Gates, with his characteristic flop of sandy hair, grinned impishly as President Barack Obama called him a “visionary” and a “driving force” behind a pair of pledges that both saw as key to the larger agreement. First the world’s largest economies would double their spending on research into clean-energy technologies. Then investors like Gates would back the startups that emerged. The Microsoft cofounder had already enlisted two dozen other billionaires to join the effort.
For Gates, who’d become increasingly consumed by this unprecedented threat to human well-being, the moment marked his arrival as a leading figure in the fight against climate change.
“If we back over 50 different breakthrough approaches, we know that several of those will give us the solution that we need,” Gates said during his own speech. He would invest at least $2 billion of his own money in companies developing geothermal wells, new kinds of nuclear reactors and machines that pull carbon from the air, to name just a few.
With much less fanfare, however, Gates has put more than double that amount into a very dirty, old-school industry. At the time of the Paris summit, he was already the dominant shareholder of America’s No. 2 landfill operator, Republic Services. He has since increased his stake to 38% of the company, a position worth $29 billion.
The ultra wealthy want the world to change … but with very strict conditions
- they first and foremost want to keep and maintain all their wealth and privilege and power
- they want everyone else to do the dirty work
- they want everyone else to pay for it all (they’ll throw in a bit of money to get it started but they want everyone to pay for it all eventually)
- they want to benefit directly from the changes so that they can exponentially grow the wealth they already have
- they want to take credit for making it happen
In summary, they want the world as it largely exists now but they don’t want the poor reputation, political backlash, civilian unrest, and for some of them, the personal guilt associated with the exploitation they built their fortunes off of and need to sustain to keep it.
Is someone suggesting an alternative to landfills right now? Recycling is already a thing, but people aren’t interested in doing it more. But if they did, it would happen at the landfill. People and or machines would have tomsift through the trash and extract recyclables. And if that were to happen, owning landfills would be a good financial move.
Recycling is a thing for metal, glass, and paper, but it’s not really a thing for plastic.
Partially true.
Plastic is difficult to recycle but not impossible.
Main reason is the sheer amount of different types of plastic that look the same.
The reason most things don’t get recycled is, because it’s cheaper to produce new.
If you bothered to read the article at all, you’d see that the problem isn’t that he’s the largest shareholder of a landfill company. It’s that:
One might imagine that a landfill operator with Gates as its largest shareholder [38%] — and with three people closely linked to Gates on its board — would lead the way in tackling those emissions. Even after seemingly softening his stance on global warming in a controversial blog post last year, Gates remains one of the world’s most prominent voices on the issue. As he did in his bestselling 2021 book “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” he continues to advocate for cutting emissions, and he has called on his fellow business leaders to do their part.
Gates, though, has failed to make Republic live up to his own climate principles, a ProPublica investigation has found. Federal inspectors have repeatedly found methane escaping from Republic landfills at levels above federal limits. The company has refrained from adopting the ambitious emissions-reduction goal embraced by its main competitor. Republic has even lobbied against policies that could make the wider industry cleaner, including by keeping organic waste out of landfills in the first place.
“It seems very likely that Bill Gates has the power to influence Republic’s behavior to make it more climate-friendly, even if that costs the company profits,” said Ann Lipton, a legal scholar who studies corporate governance at the University of Colorado, Boulder.
This is just a summary of what the article explores; there’s more if you’d care to read it instead of just assuming this investigation can be boiled down to “landfills bad lol”.
(Edit: That said, this is Lemmy; pretty much nobody here is reading beyond the headline, which is sad and pathetic but at least probably applies to the comments here attacking Gates for this too.)
Thought someone said it was paywalled, so didn’t click it. But see things are tricky. If gates tried to influence it into doing something that hurt profits, the shareholder can sue. That said, I have no illusion that bill gates is a good guy. I’m just saying I don’t think this is the big thing it is being made out to be.
- Your comment was the second one here – where the first one was: “Well then he doesn’t want to stop global warming, does me [sic]?” I personally think you’re full of shit.
- Even if you aren’t, it’s fine not to read it. What’s not fine to do is write out a comment based solely on the headline defending the subject of the investigation as though you’ve read the claims presented. Coming to the comments at all without reading it first is misguided – you’re Exhibit A – but trying to dismiss the investigation out-of-hand based solely on the headline is disgraceful.
- “But see things are tricky.” Maybe if you think they’re so tricky, you should read the goddamn article and its specific claims before continuing to defend him from this investigation based on vibes. The article is not paywalled; you can still go read it in case you want to stop wasting everyone’s time by throwing rhetorical spaghetti at the wall. Jesus christ.
You must be a lot of fun to be around.
You are correct in that I accidnetally transfered my it’s paywalled to this post from another. My bad.
That said. Since you want to be the comment police. Why is it not fine to comment on just the headline? You wanna reference some rules, or do you just like being a dick. I mean, probably isn’t a rule against that either. I am not wasting anyones time. You choose to waste your own replying.> “You must be fun to be around”
> Reaction to getting called out for shitty behavior is “dollar store Phoenix Wright villain”
I support you in your fight to uphold some kind of standard. People wanna engage in reflexive opinionation but don’t wanna put in the work. I could chide you for being curt and to the point, but these are things I feel and haven’t typed so I won’t. Let’s all support critical thinking; we need it now more than ever.
Pedophile says what?
Bill Gates can and should get fucked into orbit.
Someone that invests in a business doesn’t “earn” anything. They’re just leeching off the labor of others. Every penny he got out of those investments was food off the table of sanitation workers or extra years they have to work before retirement.
Well then he doesn’t want to stop global warming, does me?
No one who exhales carbon dioxide is truly committed to stopping global warming.
