Google is the new IBM::Years of being one-upped on AI and cracking down on innovation turned the poster child for Silicon Valley cool into a dinosaur.
You must log in or # to comment.
If you’ve ever interviewed at Google, you know why this is happening. They hire people who are as much like the people they already employ as possible, to the point that employees don’t know who they’re interviewing or even for what. The person getting hired is pre-screened for all sorts of “desirable traits” before being matched with a team. The people who succeeded there all think the same, and so they all end up having the same ideas, and the number of novel ideas nose dives.
IBM has an internal motto that they really push when you get hired there: “Treasure wild ducks”. Beyond the regular buzz word bingo of 'think different ’ and ‘move fast break things’ it means “when someone else has a crazy idea that might just work, fucking listen to them”, and it’s what’s kept them in business for literally a century. I don’t think Google has that fundamental non-self-centered DNA. Every product they’ve ever put out was a result of their intellectual monoculture and the hyper competitive mire of sameness it breeds.
Just to add, since this seems to have resonated: Google, like all the dinosaurs before it, has to change or die. IBM used to tell meat slicers. The second T in AT&T stands for Telegraph. Edison, the Google+Apple of the mid 1800’s, went bust chasing a bubble and got bought out by GE.
I doubt we’ll see a world where Google gets bought by anyone, but they shrink in size and importance until their culture changes enough to embrace the idea that innovation can happen in non-Google ways. Apple learned this lesson under Jobs, so they’ve probably got a decade or so before that starts to wear off. IBM is essentially a finance company with in-house startups, and to the article’s credit, that’s exactly what Alphabet is all about.
This is a great overview of the problem, I never even really thought about. It kind of really explains why they’ve binned and remade almost the identical apps multiple times. Maybe if they’d made more QOL and supported their apps with new novel ideas they wouldnt have slowly died out.
Or even maybe if they’d make privacy respecting software instead of spreading their legs and whoring out all the data they collected on you they’d be doing much better too. Google has become a bloated beast that needs to be put down. Anti competitive and monopolistic behaviour with no innovation, it’s a wonder anyone uses their shit apps and services anymore
Google targets ads they deliver based on the data they collect. They don’t “whore out” the data. That’s just a lie that’s been repeated so often people take it as gospel. I’ve never seen a shred of evidence to support it, and when I worked there, the employee training everyone took annually was very, very clear on respecting user privacy and getting everything reviewed by privacy experts before it could be released.
What can you expect from a company that in 2024 does not yet have a Linux client for Google Drive?
https://abevoelker.github.io/how-long-since-google-said-a-google-drive-linux-client-is-coming/
To be fair, they barely have a Windows client. I’m constantly having issues with it
Do you need it though? i feel like the linux userbase is already fairly low, and the intersection of people who cant do a RW mount with rclone ans uses linux is even lower.
You would be pouring a bunch of money into a development for the 0.001% Userbase
You can tell how passionate a company is with their products by their Linux support. That means no one there cares enough to push hard for Linux support. Even Dropbox has a Linux client.
Valve’s commitment to Linux is why I’ve consistently bought games virtually exclusively through Steam.
Just use rclone. Its bidirectional sync is kinda meh last I tested it, so I do manual syncs in each direction. Otherwise its awesome. Can even encrypt your stuff with your own key.
Supports a bunch of backends. There is an androind client called Round Sync with cron-like scheduling to keep my phone backed up.
I blame Sundar… Wayyy too many duplicated projects (e.g. Allo) and projects terminated too early (e.g., Stadia) under him.
Google was like that before Sundar.
So does this make the old IBM the new Novell?
Whats a novell?
Ha.
There’s a bank in China that avoided total pownership because they are running novell.
Mostly because the malware wasn’t expecting it. who would?
Removed by mod
Uh ibm’s not gone…
Nope, that would make it a very stupid analogy.
But IBM is just a tiny shadow of their former glory, of almost complete dominance of business computers of any size.
According to the article Google/Alphabet is losing their leadership position too, in much the same way.Might as well be, it’s not really IBM anymore.
They have a stranglehold on enterprise computing after they ate redhat, and they still make insane mainframes, they’ve just left the consumer world (which makes sense given their name i guess)
I wouldn’t go that far, there’s been a mass exodus from Redhat and they’re hardly the only game in town when it comes to mainframes. You do have a point though.
The mass exodus from RH has been massively overstated. It’s mostly a bunch of Redditors and Lemmings saying “omg I’ll never use RHEL now, even though I never have”, but in reality, they’ve not seen an exodus.
I do think their actions have a good chance of causing damage in the long term, though.
Does that make OpenAI the new Google?
The new who?
I mean, excepting that google isn’t even really the main offering when it comes to institutional compute (that’s Microsoft/ azure).
Like IBM had mainframes and legacy infrastructure on lock.
The only thing google really has on lock still is gmail, but honestly, take it or leave it.
They had search, but I get better answers asking a space heater to hallucinate a couple hundred characters for me these days.
ChatGPT is nowhere near being able to replace search, and even if it was remotely similar, many people don’t even really know what it is, whereas Google is ubiquitous with search.
To say they only have a lock on Gmail is doing them a huge disservice. They own a huge part of online advertising and search.
:Android stares intently: “Am I a joke to you?”
