• TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is quid pro quo being ruled as NOT bribery because it comes to the person on the backside of the favor. This is almost certainly to do with the majority of the court recently being outed about the amount of high value bribes gifts/vacations they are getting from “friends”.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is almost certainly to do with the majority of the court recently being outed about the amount of high value bribes gifts/vacations they are getting from “friends”.

      Nah, this is a long running theme. In chronological order-

      Sun Diamond Growers - The government must prove the bribe is actually connected to the act.

      Skilling - Corruption charges require a second party to give you a bribe or kickback, self dealing is fine.

      Citizens United - Money is political speech, and you can spend as much as you want on an election.

      McDonnell - Acting as a pay to play gatekeeper is fine. Even if the government connects the bribe to the act.

      Ted Cruz - Politicians can keep unspent campaign funds as long as they maintain the fiction of having lent the campaign money.

      Snyder - Kickbacks aren’t actionable. <- We are here.