• Tenkard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s normal to track crashes and utilization to make software better, I don’t think they tracked to sell data for advertising in bitwarden case

    • RedNight@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was actually a mistake. They were removed years ago specifically for the fdroid builds, but were reintroduced at some point on accident. Annoying mistake for sure

  • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s great news indeed!

    Now if they could consider implementing some sort of sorting and more advanced filtering that would be a huge plus, along with dupe control

  • epoch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    If the app is hosted at its own F-Droid repository, devs can add whatever they want. I wouldn’t be surprised if that build is the exact same one as the Play Store one.

    Nevertheless, good step for users! I wonder how devs will get crash reports and such stuff now, though…

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just checked F-Droid and nothing popped up. Is it coming this way? Great if it does!

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Having a repo doesn’t mean its on F-droid. I mean it does but using there repo forfeits the F-droid protections

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    How? For 2023.10.0 appmanager’s scanner does not show any of those, and it is usually very through (even right now it has identified 54 programming libraries)