Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In all likelihood calling manufacturer’s API to read the value then compare to a compile-time constant? It’s a notification hello-world merged with display-a-list hello world and manufacturer’s reading-sensor-values hello world. Yes I do think it’s borderline trivial

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Congratulations you’re clearly an amazing developer if you have to talk about this so weirdly

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah what I think is weird is that you make a bunch of assumptions about how the app is built. Experienced developers imo know that things are unexpectedly difficult all the time. Even when they are supposed to be as simple as you’re assuming here.

          • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Absolutely I am making a bunch of assumptions. Following the tried and true Keep It Simple Stupid approach. Because there is no indication given that any more complexity is required, and keeping complexity to a minimum is key to efficient development. If there was anything actually technically impressive (or at least technically impressive sounding) about what they did, I trust they would have mentioned it.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m pretty sure this guy was just a project manager or similar. So yeah I am not surprised they’re not mentioning technical hurdles.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ok but this is very simple. Everyone can set up something like this using home assistant and a few sensors connected up to it

              • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                set up != write software

                From the little I played with Arduino’s IoT platform, I honestly believe that if there is a compatible sensor that can detect vape smoke, almost anyone could get a simple version up and running. It was a very simple and largely automated setup if all you want is to get the sensor output to the portal and then link it to a UI element.

                Of course gluing together this software is more complex than that, but it’s no grand feat either.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No one said it was a grand feat. I said it was quite a bit more than hello world which it obviously is. Even if it’s only setup which we’ve no reason to think unless you think most people who claim to have written apps are lying