ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agodeleted by creatortechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1825arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1817arrow-down1external-linkdeleted by creatortechcrunch.comForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agomessage-square110fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoWiretapping laws would seem to disagree. XD
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-28 months agoWiretapping laws aren’t enforced because of copyright. Such communication isn’t the type of private communications that is copyrighted.
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months ago Wiretapping laws aren’t enforced because of copyright. Sure, but Facebook would prefer a copyright case over anything that might suggest a bill of privacy rights would be a good idea.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 months agoFacebook’s preference doesn’t change the nature of existing law.
minus-squareknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoPrecisely.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoSo do we agree that this has nothing to do with the DMCA?
Wiretapping laws would seem to disagree. XD
Wiretapping laws aren’t enforced because of copyright. Such communication isn’t the type of private communications that is copyrighted.
Sure, but Facebook would prefer a copyright case over anything that might suggest a bill of privacy rights would be a good idea.
Facebook’s preference doesn’t change the nature of existing law.
Precisely.
So do we agree that this has nothing to do with the DMCA?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator