• Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

    Me voting wouldn’t change the outcome either, considering I can’t.

     

    So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil

    Is killing wrong?

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, killing wrong.

      Killing more people with less chance to kill fewer people more wrong.

      Again, dichotomous choice. Easiest choice to make, really.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If killing is wrong, then voting to kill some rather than more is still wrong.

        I request better options.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Correction: it is less wrong.

          Standing by and letting someone kill more when your action could’ve resulted in less makes you as culpable in the killing as Biden and Harris themselves.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            We’re standing by to let killing happen right now. I’m the one saying that’s unacceptable.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can’t vote so you’re irrelevant but still, no, the only agency I’m privileged to have is my vote. Doing nothing means more die. Voting Harris means less die. Simple.