• Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    7 days ago

    “I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities,” he said during the broadcast.

    Isn’t it neat how he mixes in prescribed medical treatments? Neato.

    • TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I sure hope there will be people there that know what they’re doing. Benzo withdrawal is no joke and can lead to seizures.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      7 days ago

      Uh yeah, no.

      I once thought it might be an idea to try and back off from 100mg sertraline to 50mg sertraline and on day two I wanted to strangle people. You can take my SSRIs from my cold dead hands.

      • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        “Have you tried going outside and snapping out of it?”

        -RFK Jr., probably

        So school shootings are a mental health problem, so he wants to do the opposite of help. Goddamn, make these people make sense.

        • Sabata@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          “Have you tried going outside and snapping out of it?”

          He should let the brain worm get some sunlight.

      • brown567@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, I’m on 300mg sertraline daily, and I sometimes have trouble getting my prescription filled (understandable, it’s a way bigger dose than usual)

        But if I’m not on it, the suicidal thoughts usually start on day 3

        So if they were to take my SSRIs, I would quickly be killed by my own cold, dead hands

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          How are you going to kill yourself with your own cold dead hands? That implies you’re already dead. I guess you could chop them off and strangely yourself with them. That’d be pretty gruesome, but you do you I guess.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m going to try and write on my brain to turn those thoughts entirely on the people who decided I shouldn’t get my meds anymore.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, getting on and off medications is no easy task sometimes. And we already have mental health facilities you can go to for med adjustments. It’s just not free.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. On my current dose, I’m pretty good. Less? I very quickly go back to the state that brought me to where I needed to get on this medication. I am much better off staying on this dose until the end of my days, and frankly, so is everyone who has to interact with me.

          That said, “not being free” made it so that I couldn’t stay on meds when I was in my twenties. The several other obstacles I dealt with over the decades mostly had to do with insurance that I had.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      He’s a big believer in the whole “keeping people on drugs isn’t the fix” kind of thinking. It’s short-sighted and ignorant of the fact that a lot of people on them have a net benefit to function in society.

      What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to “Well look at me. I’ve never needed these drugs, and I’m totally fine. WTF, people?”

      If you want a country that is doing the proper work to stop jumping to long-term prescriptions as problem solvers, I’m all for that. DO NOT confuse that with these dumb shit he’s suggesting though.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, you want to start with making it so I can live a full life without Adderall? Awesome, I’m all for it, start by building a robust and accessible public transportation network that allows for intercity and intracity transportation conveniently at all times of day, because trust me you do not want be driving unmedicated. Then you’re gonna need to solve the unable to maintain employment without meds problem. And even if you do all that I’ll fight you taking my meds tooth and nail because I feel seriously disabled without them and would much rather go without hearing aids than without adderall.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I agree with the principal sentiment. Except for schizophrenia and other illnesses involving acute psychosis, drugs shouldnt be the permanent solution.

        But this requires access to proper psychotherapy, which needs to be part of a consistent concept of slowly reducing the drugs as the condition gets better.

        Also this requires a society, where people have enough agency to remove the causes of psychological distress from their life. People getting anxieties is perfectly normal, if they are in constant fear to not be able to pay their bills. People getting depressed is perfectly normal, if they are expected to work a dead end job for the rest of their lifes, etc.

        I see none of that coming from the direction of any politician.

        EDIT: Wow. People get offended by the idea not to pump people full of drugs for the rest of their lifes, when therapy is a viable alternative. Seriously why do you want people to suffer instead of providing proper healthcare including proper access to therapy and creating life conditions that aren’t designed to make people sick? I never thought this to be controversial.

        • Tower@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, not just for “schizophrenia and other illnesses involving acute psychosis”.

          My brain literally does not properly process dopamine. Adderall, Ritalin, Strattera, etc help this. No matter how much my stress in life is reduced, I still need meds like these to function properly.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah, without psychiatric grade stimulants I simply cannot function properly. Not just in a “industrialized society” way, but also in a “cooking, cleaning, regulating my emotions, regulating my behavior…” way. Without these meds I would need disability support, with them I’m able to support my household

        • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ah, but you make an exception for one of the most harmful kinds of perscription drugs that comes with severe side effects often far worse than the symptoms they’re meant to treat. It’s different because psychotic people scaaaaryyy I suppose?

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It is different because there is no alternative to reliably prevent psychosis afaik.

            Why the hell do you get offended by the idea to minimize use of psychatric drugs where possible and to continue use where necessary?

            • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              There’s no alternative to reliably treat many other psychiatric issues. And antipsychotics are often not worth the extremely debilitating side effects.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Therapy is great. For some of us it’s necessary but not sufficient. If a medication can help me, it should be my right to decide if I want it as a permanent part of my treatment plan for as long as it helps.

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If someone has a liver, heart, or kidney problem, and need drugs to fix a deficiency - no problem.

          But if it’s the brain you suggest not using drugs?

          “Hey, person with a heart arrhythmia. Just get over it!”

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Again nowhere did i say that. The precondition is always that therapy is available and working. But therapy is expensive and requires individual therapists. Making and selling psychiatric drugs can be done as an efficient business. And the companies doing so are such great benevolent entities that they have paid record sums in compensations for victims of them pushing the drugs. This includes often families where the drugs lead to psychosis, suicide, homicide, adverse health problems…

            The very fact that psychiatric drugs can be advertised on TV in the US is complete madness. But i guess if you are a dealer or addict, nuance is easy to ignore.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I really wonder why you get offended by “We should try to minimize the use of psychatric drugs, where therapy is a viable alternative”?

            Do you prefer taking drugs with potentially severe side effects for the rest of your life? Do you want people to die, because some life event outside their control prevents them from accessing drugs like SSRIs or Benzodiazepines that can be deadly if quit cold turkey?

            Nothing of that has to do with maga nutjobs. On the contrary it should be basic human decency to find and provide the least harmful treatment.

            • Charapaso@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              I really wonder why you get offended by “We should try to minimize the use of psychatric drugs, where therapy is a viable alternative”?

              What you said here wouldn’t ruffle nearly as many feathers, because IMHO in your other post you buried the lede.

              It’s definitely good to say that we need better access to therapy, and to improve societal conditions, since many people would be healthier with those instead of drugs. We’d all benefit!

              Then there’s proposals by hardcore wingnuts like RFK that…are unreasonable to the point of doing outright harm. You just got confused for the latter, I guess. I wasn’t sure about your first comment, either.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 days ago

        “Well look at me. I’ve never needed these drugs [He does], and I’m totally fine [He’s not]. WTF, people?”

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          He THINKS he’s fine because he lives in a bubble with other people who are willing to accept and normalize his unmedicated issues at great personal cost. And now, instead of being kicked to the roadside or reckoning with the idea of “maybe I’m the asshole here”, he plans to make the whole US into his safe space so he doesn’t have to be confronted with an idea outside his sphere.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to “Well look at me. I’ve never needed these drugs, and I’m totally fine. WTF, people?”

        Except he looks like a reanimated corpse and sounds like a frog that died on a log in a bog.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s all the same when you believe in conspiracy theories, are not a Dr., and had a brain worm die in your head.

      Also, how in the hell do we not have at least a medical degree as the very 1st requirement for a position that controls/shapes medical care for the country?!

      … to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities …

      Is this paid time/leave? Who does he envision paying for his “wellness farms”? Or is this him envisioning everyone creating some commune farm where everyone is eating mushrooms and killing bears?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      does that include his new bosses?

      gonna need at least four years to get them all cleaned up and ‘reconnected with communities’.

      and we better lock 'em all up just to make sure we don’t miss a straggler or two.