In the popular imagination of many Americans, particularly those on the left side of the political spectrum, the typical MAGA supporter is a rural resident who hates Black and Brown people, loathes liberals, loves gods and guns, believes in myriad conspiracy theories, has little faith in democracy, and is willing to use violence to achieve their goals, as thousands did on Jan. 6.

According to a new book, White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy, these aren’t hurtful, elitist stereotypes by Acela Corridor denizens and bubble-dwelling liberals… they’re facts.

The authors, Tom Schaller, a professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and Paul Waldman, a former columnist at The Washington Post, persuasively argue that most of the negative stereotypes liberals hold about rural Americans are actually true.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah I know they’re facts. I spend far too much time as a semi-passing trans woman in rural America. I think a lot of people overestimate the proportions of these people, I’ve met so many thoughtful, kind, and progressive hicks, hillbillies, and other rural sorts.

    But the fact is I’ve never seen passive aggressive Bible verses on mailboxes in cities. I’ve never heard an educated urban coworker rant and rave about how blm protesters are funded by George soros. I’ve never seen city folk wear a mask that says “government control device” on it or carry a Bible with them onto a factory floor or put newsmax on the company share point.

    And the armed city folk I know are far more likely to be responsible gun owners and not have a couch gun. Jesus fucking shit so many people talk about their fucking couch gun and they always act like it’s reasonable and normal and every gun owner has one instead of the reality that that’s not a safe place to have a gun. They also don’t realize that you shouldn’t advertise owning the only thing that gets more valuable when stolen, especially not by putting a bumper sticker saying one is in the fucking car.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m always amazed that a bunch of redneck, Southern, city haters decided that a rich, Manhattan developer was one of them

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hard to give them a decent education when they defund the school systems because ‘muh taxes’ and denigrate their teachers and everything else public Ed ('ceptin the “pride of the town”, the HS football team, because that one QB is gonna git scouted ‘cuz he’ s got a helluva arm)

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          They are the cause of their own downfall and reject any ideas that might help them. They deserve no pity. They’ve earned their place in the intellectual hierarchy. The smart ones all leave for cities with no plans to return.

            • Clent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m not sure what your point is. Being a farmer doesn’t make one worthy of worship. It also has no bearing on what I said. Most rural people are not farmers.

              At least you know you’re among the most stupid, so you’ve got that going for you.

                • Clent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You have no idea what I do and do not know.

                  By your own reasoning as you’ve outlined it, you are the one looking in the mirror here.

                  You are presuming a whole lot about me here based on very little, which is hilarious and yet sad.

                  I stand by what I said. Your attempt to disparage me is about you. If you had any interest in proving me wrong, you would be able to do so with facts instead of lashing out at me like a wounded animal.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Rural America is a wasteland filled with scared, angry, bitter people because WE, as a country, made it that way.

          Sorry, one more thought. No one ever voted for “let’s impoverish rural america” just like no one ever voted for “let’s make sure teachers can barely afford to live on their salary, while also expecting them to be the primary source of education for literally everyone in the country.” Teachers (and many other groups) have a lot of righteous anger too. I don’t see them doing what maga is doing, and I wouldn’t expect them to get a pass if they did.

          While I am more than OK laying much of this at the feet of corporate greed, I’m less so inclined to lay much of it at the feet of average non-rural folks just trying to get to work and feed their families every day. As you say - they’ve got the same requirement to do so as the magas.

      • elbucho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know… morons.

    • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They simply deny everything you present to them. Facts do not matter. They are literally living in their own imagination and refuse to accept reality. It is time to reopen the mental institutions and throw them back in, along with the ACLU clowns who let them out to begin with.

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Rural America is mostly a wasteland. It’s either where people of means deliberately choose to live away from society, or it’s people who are too ignorant, poor and/or drug-addled to have much choice. Neither group is going to be left-leaning… and that’s why when you look at electoral maps, you see all that red.

    Pick a highway, any will do, travel along it and tell me what you see. I already know. One little failed town after another. They might have a dive bar or ancient gas station, but most commercial buildings will be long abandoned. If you need anything, you’ll have to find a decent city with a generic walmart, dollar general, mcdonalds, etc. Long gone are the mom-and-pop grocers, general stores, etc.

    The irony is these are solid red Republican districts. Cities have major problems too, but they are full of action; plans, projects, hopes of a better future. There is no future for the average rural American.

    They are frustrated and angry, as well they should be. Too bad they can’t see the forest through the trees.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The electorial college is a threat to democracy.

    But neither political party wants to hand that control over to voters.

    We need a critical mass of progressive politicians in office before we can fix the system, which is why they’re everyone else’s biggest political enemy

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The funny thing is the electoral college was designed to counter exactly this event. In the case an absolute tyrant is going to get voted in, the electoral college is supposed to be the last chance to challenge it. But with the way the GOP is going, ain’t no one gonna challenge anything.

      As they say, the devil will come bearing a cross wrapped in the American flag.

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The GOP has shown, and proven, they will use any and all means necessary, including violence, to gain power. This isn’t theoretical anymore.

        I’m so tired of my family members and other people that identify as “centralist” saying that both sides are bad.

        No…only one side has used violence to overthrow an election. And that side’s political leadership said it was “normal political discourse”.

        If both sides are the same, then you should be upset that “both sides” are violent.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That was the story, but the real reason was the existing tyrants didn’t want to be overthrown either.

        You have to have a realistic view of what we started out with to understand why 99% of the people in politics don’t want to change it.

        At the end of the day, America has never really been a democracy. And the people who can change that just don’t want to.

        It’s just easiest to hold onto that power when we think change is just an election away. It’s a lot of elections away, we can’t just win one and go home. It’s a war not a battle.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      “mass of progressive politicians” so you want every single person in America to think, act, feel, and vote the same? That doesn’t happen anywhere in the world…well, except communist countries of course.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s not what they said. Progressive is just basically rational. Progressives think differently about things all the time. It isn’t really a nailed-down ideology of any sort.

        Whereas conservatives are notable for not thinking much about anything at any time. Besides their fears. Having no discernible ideology themselves other than they want what they want. And they need someone to hate and scapegoat.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          An liberals are? Why do these articles always attack one side? I live in California, I’m seeing first hand what these extreme liberal views are doing. There’s people literally fighting for the right to allow the homeless to use drugs, shoot up heroin, and shit and piss wherever they want… it’s ridiculous. And don’t get me started on the petty crime that’s being ignored…because apparently, according to liberals, we need to completely revamp our criminal and judicial system because people who steal shit shouldn’t be going to prison… it’s fucking ridiculous.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    loves gods and guns

    Ok, I was well aware of the gun fetishism, but I gotta say that the polytheism is very surprising!

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it’s funny that they call themselves monotheistic and then do these verbal gymnasics to keep that true (like calling other deities ‘saints’ or claiming that Jesus is god’s son but also 100% the same entity as god - oh yeah and that holy spirit thing too).

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The most generous interpretation of Christianity is that it’s monotheish. The Doctrine of the Trinity is like crypto: you can’t understand it unless you believe in it.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Our style of government is the largest threat to democracy.

    We need to eliminate the electoral college, primaries, the Senate, President restricted to 1 term, perhaps 6 years, term limits for the House, All elections publicly funded, No reason elections cant be conducted via encrypted open source app, where voting can be done remotely and checks in place to ensure the vote has been tallied. No party affiliation on any campaign documents, signs, advertisements, no straight ticket voting.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Voting booths exist for a reason. They are to ensure the privacy of the person voting.

      Otherwise all sorts of overbearing people can force others to vote per their direction.

      Consider an abusive partner, or a extremist pastor, or a factory manager. In all cases they have power over others, and voting may be one of the few places where individuals can express their choices.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Voting booths are an outdated relic. We live in the most technologically advanced age ever and we should still rely on methods from the 1800s? What would be more convenient than pulling out your phone, wherever you are, being able to pull up details and platform of every candidate, make selections, then cast your ballot? Force people to vote on policies, not parties.

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          i like the idea of voting by encrypted app as an option, but lots of disenfranchised/disempowered folks can’t rely on that. by which i mean there are homeless folks without phones, and people with abusive families who lack privacy/safety to really utilize it the way we night intend.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just love how if you don’t vote Democrat, or you don’t have liberal views, you’re a “threat to democracy.” I swear, if it was up to some of you, we’d be a one party system, with every single American thinking the EXACT same way…

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Didn’t actually read the article did ya?

      Hint: the article isn’t saying all Republicans are a threat to democracy. It’s saying that those who hold anti-democratic views–e.g. election denialism, supporting returning Trump to power by force, etc–are predominantly rural white Republicans.

      Those are just facts. You can either accept those facts or join those folks in denying reality.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        We both know the article is basically saying that one party is a threat, and the other can just do whatever they want. It’s been like that forever now… Republicans= bad, Democrats= good.