• boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    How is this incorrect? In which field? And how do you confirm you the validity of your methodology?

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Replication rarely happens and in many cases is outright impossible due to lack of shared code.

      Things should be replicable, but that hasn’t been the case for a while.

      • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        the correct term you need is ‘unachievable’, not ‘false’. […] anyway, it depends on the field and type of study.

          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Common standards for language formally used in a specific field/profession/discipline aren’t “wordplay” lol

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              This isn’t a professional forum. Playing the “it’s a technical term” game is absolutely wordplay.