• Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Serious question… If you believe in social programs then, wherever you are, what makes you “right leaning”?

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Actually, that’s a typo. I intended to put left leaning, I thought I put left leaning, and reading it back a moment before seeing your comment, I noticed the error.

      Whoops. My bad.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Are you asking all of us? I’m personally a constitutionalist. That never used to be right-leaning, but it’s now forced in that camp. Im also a staunch supporter of biological women’s sports staying that way, and opening categories that incorporate trans men and trans women together in one. Much more interesting sporting that way anyway. Includes everyone, you’ll see more trans men in sports (very few if none as of now) and you get to keep biological women sports as fair as possible.

      Evil, I know. 🙄

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Sports forced me to what?

          In my reply, I said I’m a constitutionalist. It used to be a thing that wasn’t defined as right-wing, but whatever the new DNC left has become, they’re the ones who are insisting constitutionalists are right-leaning.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Thanks for answering… Personally my thought is that anyone should be allowed to compete in any sport they qualify for… Just add more league levels. Don’t have to name them in a hierarchical way. Sort of like heavy weight vs feather weight… The competition is still going to be good because you’ve divided athletes by ability level, not something as arbitrary as sex or gender assigned at birth. If a woman or trans person can somehow compete with men (assigned at birth) in the NFL, I wanna see that shit. Sure you’d probably just end up with a league full of women, less talented men, and trans people, but at least they’d all be competitive in that league. Shit, maybe if there were some trans women or less skilled men in the “women’s” leagues people might actually watch them. Idk… I’m definitely talking out of turn; personally I think organized sports are as bad for society as organized religion.

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s gets super convoluted at that point. Men and women who have switched genders by way of hormones is an easy solution. You can have the same league levels as we do now, not have to make up a whole bunch of new ones, and you keep women’s sports for assigned at birth

          To be clear, mens sports are usually open sports, they started being called men sports when women had to open up their own, but I think anyone can partake. They don’t, because they lose, and it makes it not fun. So open categories aren’t an answer. But a hormone competitions are a great one. :)