Summary

Trust in the U.S. judicial system has hit a record low, with only 35% of Americans expressing confidence, according to Gallup.

Criticism centers on the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, accused of advancing right-wing agendas, eroding rights like abortion access, and lacking accountability.

This judicial capture, orchestrated by conservative groups like the Federalist Society, ensures Republican dominance in key policies for decades, regardless of future elections.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Well, the ramifications is more vigilantism. Trust in the justice system is a requirement for people to assume justice will be done through that system. When people no longer trust it then they seek alternative methods.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    That sounds bad indeed.

    Comparison: over here in Estonia, out of the general population, 71% trust the courts (an increase from 55% as measured back in 2013). Out of lawyers, 88% trust the courts here. A bit north of here, in Finland, 83% of the population “think that the courts are independent or very independent” (I failed to find a direct question about trust).

  • Why would I trust a branch of government who, amoung other things, said; president’s rule like kings; money is speech; rulings from the 1600s supercede any modern day interpretation of law.

    I wouldn’t invite a person like this into my house non the less let them rule a branch of government.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Trust in law enforcement has been plummeting for a long time too. Prosecutors are going to have a much harder time convincing a jury of much of anything.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Luigi Mangione has a higher favorability than the US justice system.

    That’s where we’re fucking at.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As I had to explain to my boomers “you worked for the state government long term, and 15 years at a single company, respectively, prior to retirement. You both got into good positions wrt: healthcare coverage. People these days are unable to secure promotion without job hopping, and are subject to rolling layoffs, putting them fully at the mercy of whatever low budget health insurance their new companies decide to use, but additionally, companies are swapping to cheaper plans for new/existing employees to save overall money, meaning what you were offered and what your newer peers were offered was probably not the same before you retired.”

          They do not at all get it and they are not into my hype for it. Not a bit.

          • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            To say nothing of all our other problems, anyone should be able to grasp the idea that the US health insurance industry is inherently evil. They provide and create nothing. It’s a whole sector of the economy that exists solely to extract profit by amplifying human suffering and death. It should and must be abolished.

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The US justice system has gone out of its way to make itself not trustworthy. It’s surprising it’s that high.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well 3 of 9 judges supported putting in codified ethics I believe. So that means I’d think 33% of them were trustworthy. Throw in 2% for the people who answered, yes I trust them… because they trust them to act in their own best interests, and we got to 35% haha

  • ramsorge@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The guardian are corporate shills. This is a GOOD thing. If Luigi wins, that’s precedence. Time to pop some brass.*

    * brass, meaning c-suite

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          From what I read Biden didn’t seek that judge to pardon, he was just one person affected by some big mass pardons. In this case I think he was one of like 1500 people who were moved to house arrest for non-violent crimes during Covid, who Biden pardoned all at once.

          Still not great, the administration should’ve reviewed the details of those cases first, but it’s not like he deliberately sought the guy out.

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The mass wave of pardons has really highlighted to me how broken the justice system is, but for complicated reasons. I can’t remember which case it was, but I read of one of the controversial pardons and felt outraged. Then someone, much like yourself, pointed out that this was due to the COVID house arrest stuff, and I conceded that it probably made sense. But then I felt conflicted, because if I didn’t want them to be back in prison, why did I still feel so angry?

            The unfortunate answer is that prison doesn’t give us justice. I have been a victim of crimes that I haven’t reported because I have seen how traumatising that process is for victims. When the trial is over and the perpetrator is behind bars, the person most affected by the crime must then struggle to heal from both the trauma of the original incident, and the additional, separate trauma of interacting with the justice system. Seeing someone punished might soothe the sting a little, but it doesn’t help one to heal.

            Reading about restorative justice approaches makes me feel hopeful, though it’s a radical enough approach that we haven’t had many chances to see it in action. Even if the cultural consciousness moved away from its retributive understanding of justice, widespread implementation of restorative approaches wouldn’t be a straightforward task. However, I feel that for a huge amount of cases, it would be better than we have now.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            How can we know this for sure though. Not trying to throw rocks at you, but to me that really sounds like speculation. at the end of the day he is accountable for his actions and I have seen way too many “woopsies” in the arc of his career. Past a certain point “I made a mistake” loses all credibility.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I mean, epistemologically we can’t know anything for sure. All we can do is try to come to reasonable conclusions with the information available to us.

              The job of President is complicated. It is not remotely possible to go over every single detail of every single action. Every president makes whoopsies, I prefer to give benefit of the doubt between mistakes and malice. There are plenty of intentional things to criticize without sensationalizing this sort of thing

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    30% lost faith when we prosecuted Trump.

    35% lost faith when Trump walked.

    Seems to track to me!

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      yeah, different parties. But Luigi appeals to both party’s constituents, so during his prosecution the judiciary is at an extra disadvantage. I imagine the government will try to use some sort of secret closed to the public terrorism court for this so they can eliminate the trial of his peers aspect of it. I’d bet real money on it right now, actually

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was trying to understand why they laid a terrorism charge, since it raises Luigi’s profile when obviously they want to sweep him under the rug. I think you’re on to something here.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s my concern and my guess as to why he’s been charged with terrorism.