Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 days agomy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1487arrow-down16
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkmy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 days agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 days agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squareTyfud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks