• Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Many Signal alternatives also have security issues of their own, often making them less secure than Signal. This includes Matrix and XMPP. In the blog post regarding XMPP+OMEMO, the author replies to a question about which would be better than Signal, Matrix, and XMPP with this suggestion:

    Anyone who cares about metadata resistance should look at Cwtch, Ricochet, or any other Tor-based solution. Not a mobile app. Not XMPP. Not Matrix.

    In regards to Ricochet, not having a mobile app version makes it difficult to recommend to less tech savvy people.

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Matrix, even if it was a siv, would be better than Signal, because it doesn’t know your phone and passport numbers.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sure, every platform has its own set of problems, and it’s fine to make an informed decision that you’re willing to accept the deficiencies of a particular platform you’re using. The issue I have is with people pretending that Signal doesn’t have the problems that it has as we can see happening in this very thread.

      • Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’m with you there. This wasn’t meant as an argument against your statement. I brought up the issues regarding Matrix and XMPP as they are often recommended as alternatives to Signal, and after learning about this blog in a previous conversation I had about this topic, I thought it would be a good resource to bring up so people can be informed about those platforms and some alternatives that may be better than Signal while being metadata resistant.