• waitmarks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      people keep saying this, but what is their extinguish plan? how could they realistically extinguish linux? it’s not a company they can buy, or even a single thing they can ruin.

        • waitmarks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          That is my point, they have tried and failed completely before when their main product was windows licenses. Now, linux is incredibly important to their azure business, they wouldn’t want to potentially cause detriment to that and is far more important to them than windows licenses.

          Also why would we have to rip out systemd, even if they tried to claim ownership of it and make it proprietary, it could be forked from before the license change and we would keep on going like nothing happened.

            • waitmarks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              What are you even talking about? systemd is currently under an opensource license, they cant retroactively change that. Any changes would be for it going forward if it is even possible for them to buy the rights to it (which I’m not convinced it is as Lennart Poettering is not the sole contributor and Red Hat / IBM and many others also have a significant stake in it). Sun patented Java on it upon its creation and when oracle bought sun, they bought the rights to those patents. They aren’t comparable situations. Java was never open source, it was source available, but still proprietary.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This sounds a bit ridiculous. If Linus started working at MS I wonder if people would suddenly think Linux was a MS project and start hating on it.