• NathanUp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This. How an advanced use case is accomplished is not a point against a system’s usability.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The point I was trying to make is that if you ever want to do something that is not covered with an out of the box install, it’s typically far harder to do in Linux than in Windows (although my ~15 years as a windows sysadmin probably bias my opinion)

      Windows is turning into a telemetry nightmare because about 10 years ago Microsoft figured out that they could sell ad space and monetize user data, so I’m trying to get off the platform before my LTSC install hits EOL. But I have to admit it’s a hard path.

      • PM_me_your_doggo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But in your example raid controller driver was covered in an out of the box install in windows. If it wasn’t you’ll still need to do pretty much the same. Also there was a couple of weird steps in your linux list like switching DE to run a couple of CLI commands and disabling AHCI for some reason.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        For advanced, power user stuff, I find Linux to be much friendlier and faster. Just being able to do everything in a Terminal instead of having to mess around with a mix of inconsistent GUI menus in the two different control panels, gpedit, regedit (which is an entire headache by itself), a mix of cmd and Powershell (and whatever Windows Terminal is) is just so much less of a headache.

        Also I find things easier to script in Linux compared to Windows.

        Not to mention the mess that is Windows Update, which doesn’t even upgrade third party software, and takes a long time to actually do the updates. Package management is a godsend. Windows has chocolatey and winget, but those are poor substitutes.

        And I say all of this as someone who is technically proficient in both.

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        (although my ~15 years as a windows sysadmin probably bias my opinion)

        So basically: it’s not any harder in linux, but you have more than a decade of muscle memory in windows, so it’s harder for you.

        That’s like saying “Japanese is a less efficient language than English, all of the words are different, and when I want to say a word, I have to learn it first, but in English I just know the words! English is so much better! (My 30 years speaking english probably bias my opinion)”

        Things are certainly different, but its hard to compare which is “harder” for the advanced use cases.

        There’s no shame in having long term experience with one platform and having that shape your expectation about how a solution should look.