How come people say 5,000 km and not 5 Mm?
why not just say millions of meters or Mega meters?

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Familiarity I guess. Mega isn’t really a widely used prefix outside of computers. We even say tons instead of megagrams.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jokes on you elite dangerous uses Mm/s for lowest speeds in supercruise before it changes to “c” for relative to light speed

  • IsoSpandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well mainly because where we might need to use these units, we have more standard non si units, we use AU, Light years and Parsecs where Megameters, Gm, TM etc would be useful

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s also scientific notation which eliminates having to use these prefixes so you can more easily compare and manipulate numbers.

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I do. Unfortunately, I don’t have many opportunities to do so. Which may be the reason why people don’t say megameter.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Aside of kilometers there used to be “myriameter” (a myriad meters = 10,000 m = 10 km).

    Fun thing, in Sweden they use mil for 10 km. In Finland there’s peninkulma for 10 km, but it’s very archaic.

  • kinttach@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    On Earth it’s just not needed. In nearby space it could make sense — distance to the Moon is 369 Mm. Distance to the Sun 149 Gm. But people aren’t good at visualizing the difference between kilo-, mega-, and giga-. It isn’t obvious from those numbers just how much further away the Sun is.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      For interplanetary space and beyond the time it takes for light to cross the distance makes more sense, I’d say. The moon is about half a second away, the sun about eight minutes, Voyager I a bit less than twenty hours, Alpha Centauri or Barnard’s about four years, and so on…

  • 0485@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    We already have this in Sweden. 10km in Sweden is 1 mil (Swedish mile).

    When we sell/buy used cars and other types of vehicles we always count the mileage in Swedish miles.

    Kilometers work but is just absurd when you start talking about 100k+ kms.

  • SteveDinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Scientific notation for everything: 5 x 10^6 m. Seriously though, I think it would be easier to think about it in megameters or gigameters if it were more standard to do so.

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not much need to use Mm, it doesn’t come up very often. So when it does it’s easier to use thousands of km so as to not confuse people with “another” measurement.

    • ebc@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      We routinely count vehicle odometers in thousands of kilometers, AKA Megameters. I’d say it’s a common enough measurement to popularize Megameters

  • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In our primary schools, we learn our children mili, deci, centi, deca, hecto and kilo, and how to calculate between them.

    Beyond that or below that is used either in science classes or specific usecases and not known by the whole population at large.

    Since people use what they know, they’d never use mega as a common way of measuring. We mostly use km for distance, and only in specific cases we might use, say, hectometers or decameters.

    5 megameter is not wrong, but I don’t call 34 cm 3,4 decimeters either(unless decimeters make sense of course :p)

    • joel_feila@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Here i learn mega, giga, tera. But show up in computer which is like place you most commonly see them.

      • takeheart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My physics teacher once told us that this was due to the influence of disciplines that calculate with huge masses, say in astrophysics the weight of a planet or the the amount of oxygen within it. Don’t know how much of it is true but the basic tenet of everyone preferring the numbers that they work with on a daily basis having as few prefixes as possible as it makes mentally handling and remembering them easier.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve always found that strange. I guess a kilogram is a lot closer to “human scale” than a gram, maybe that’s why they picked it.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Having meter as a base unit makes more sense than kg because meter lacks any prefix.

  • Jojo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve seen megameters used in the context of astronomical distances, but not terrestrial ones. I think terrestrially, the familiarity of kilometers helps with a sense of scale.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The beauty of the metric system is you don’t lose a sense of scale from using a higher unit because you can intuitively know 1Mm is 1000km.