1. over time this might affect our collective consciousness in regards to the purpose & function of the eggplant; and

  2. can we please just get a straightforward penis emoji already?? Half the human population has a penis attached to their bodies anyway, why are we still so prude about incorporating actual penises into mainstream vernacular & daily life?

addendum:

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There’s actually kind of a funny history behind the Eggplant emoji. Emoji are Japanese in origin and around the time they were taking off there was this Survivor like gameshow where one guy was confined to his apartment and he had to try and survive past the basics by applying for and winning sweepstakes items from various promotions from newspapers and magazines.

    The participant’s shortened form name was Nasu - which means “eggplant” so since the guy started the challenge with literally nothing including clothes they put a little Eggplant over his junk in post. That became a Japanese cultural meme that translated over once emoji became more widely adopted.

    You probably won’t see actual dick emoji in the actual set because emoji are an all ages access thing and exist on an international level. It’s actually kind of funny how different cultures use the same finite set. Like in China how the angel emoji is construed as “I’m going to end you”. One could see the things as becoming essentially a hieroglyphic set where they gain their own full individual linguistic meanings.

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    8================D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~🍆

    Edit: Sorry to everyone, but I think I just won the Internet. You’re welcome, in advance.

  • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m sure it’s not a surprise that this post was reported. From what I saw, the conversation remained focused on society and anatomy and remained far less graphic than a basic anatomy textbook. Thanks everyone.

    It was also reported for not having the whole thought in the title.

    Great post.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can we please stop these idiotic calls to de-profanify all things and pretend everything’s for every situation.

    Are you aware we invented clothing super super super early on, and that humans tend to wear loincloths when there’s no other need for clothing?

    Stop trying to greenfield rewrite culture. It’s like trying to tear down a bridge you’re standing on.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t get this, it should be enough to choose for yourself to use or not use profanity, but somehow it isn’t. Why?

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There is no good answer to that question. Too many don’t understand the importance of context/intention, and unfortunately they are also the same ones that get easily offended on behalf of everyone else. Part of the “but, the discussion should be more about meeee, and my feelings, and how offended I am”-mindset.

        Which is why “kid cosplaying as early days MJ” manages to offend anyone. Why you cannot watch the Community episode on D&D. Why they likely wouldn’t dare make Tropic Thunder today. Why many git-branches are renamed to main, etc, ad nauseum.

        Even though unicode group could (and IMO should) define all things useful, I don’t see why “male-genitals-flaccid”, and variations, couldn’t be specified. Doesn’t require any application level visual implementation. But those that do, and have good reason to, can use a specification, rather than make up their own. Not really a big deal, of course.

        If you can have

        "1F646 🙆 face with “ok” gesture, described as a person with arms raised above the head forming a “circle”, interpreted as “OK sign” (derived from the Japanese gesture for “OK”). Intended as gender-neutral but represented as a woman on most platforms

        Just, throw in a penis or two. It’s… fine

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    We can’t even have a gun or a middle finger emoji. I doubt we’re getting a penis one anytime soon.