You can try it right now, actually.

see also Letterboxd for just reviews

it sounded more like simply asking the US Justice department to do a specific thing/voting into them doing the thing than changing anything about the system that makes spending possible

seems like a lot of work to do everything but organize a revolution

sauce?

the problem with that is Epstein did use em dashes in his emails, or at least double hyphens supposed to be em dashes

oh i thought you were referring to people saying it to illustrate how bad the system is and how important trump winning the election was lol. i definitely agree that it doesn’t justify what he’s doing (even if it legally stands, even if it legally stands, it doesn’t stand socially)

but it is not inaccurate to say nearly half of the citizens preferred him on election day. per the link, pew research shows 48% of non-voters would’ve voted for trump as opposed to 45%, with a pretty high validity.

it’s like gravity

(small objects don’t have (well, show, I guess but uhhh) it but large ones do)

NPR: Trump would have won even if everyone eligible voted. I agree that substantial Trump voters disapprove of current events, but the truth is one in two US citizens preferred Trump over Harris on Election Day. Not to mention turnout was 64% not 42%, so it’s 30% not 20%

yeah that is indeed my last sentence. i’m pointing out that maybe this means capital can sort of back-and-forth this. anti-immigration to get into power and do pro-capital things, then be pro-immigration to get into power and expand labor force, repeat

it’s interesting you point out successful social movements are often aligned with capital, as the major totalitarian thing today, action against illegal immigrants, is action against expanding the labor force. it gets society invested in giving capital power though

i’m guessing those trans pride colors in the sign weren’t intentional then…

(like look at that these are like the only pastel colors)

ah, Deutsche-Welle, Germany’s NPR. they are really good, and they publish articles too.

https://www.dw.com/

This is great (Wiley). Thanks!

note that this is a video channel that doesn’t seem to produce articles. every single piece on the frontpage is clickbait. Let’s see if they’re also BS.

The End of Israel: The Ultimate Evidence
You won’t see this on the BBC or CNN

This is just what every Lemming knows about Israel already + “no apartheid could possibly endure”. The video ends on “When and how the system of ethnic supremacy in the eastern Mediterranean comes to an end is impossible to foresee, but end it will.”

I see no original research.

British Journalist UNCOVERS SHOCKING Iran War COVER-UP
You won’t see this on the BBC or CNN
Peter Oborne, US Politics, Global Politics

This is just “British journalism is bad”, illustrated with examples from Daily Mail, Telegraph, BBC. I mean, you’re not wrong, but…

No revelations here. The Guardian isn’t even mentioned and I think The Guardian is still pretty good.

Domestic UK affairs are undeserving of the label “Global Politics” and absolutely not “US politics”.

At this point I don’t want to analyze more videos. I’ll just post the headlines of the other four pieces on the frontpage.

HE’S ACTUALLY DOING IT: Trump, Israel, and the End of the Global Economy
The ULTIMATE Betrayal
Richard Sanders - US Politics, Global Politics

Lowkey EXPOSES Trump’s Iran War for Israel
Lowkey EXPOSES Trump’s Iran War for Israel
Lowkey - US Politics, Global Politics

Iran War EXPOSED: The Video Trump Doesn’t Want You To See
How Trump BETRAYED America for Israel
Matt Kennard - US Politics, Global Politics

Why Trump REALLY Attacked Iran
The Chilling Truth Behind Trump’s Dark Agenda
Lowkey - US Politics, Global Politics

note this neat, website-exclusive disclosure:

The views expressed in this video belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of DDN.

unwilling to take accountability, DDN’s editorial board does not seem strong.

This is targeted towards industrial needs so I doubt it’d be available for consumer purchase (, just industry purchase).

Can anyone verify the post’s “16 years (6,000 cycles)” claim? I have access to the paper’s content and I don’t see either figure. In fact, even its abstract says “more than 950 cycles”.

I’m guessing you have examples? I don’t see anything I wouldn’t expect in the closeup in https://www.nickiswift.com/1909492/plastic-surgeon-trump-ear-injury-one-year-after-butler-shooting/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/karoline-leavitt-shots-fired/

TL;DR: the press secretary used the slang meaning “trump’s fiery speech at the dinner will absolutely annihilate our enemy journalists (with jabs)”

sauce?