![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
It’s also completely unnecessary. The shooter was a registered republican and apparently known to be a horrible shot, so he wasn’t left-wing and definitely wasn’t recruited by any organization for his sharpshooting skills.
It’s also completely unnecessary. The shooter was a registered republican and apparently known to be a horrible shot, so he wasn’t left-wing and definitely wasn’t recruited by any organization for his sharpshooting skills.
Thank you. That’s a great example of real whataboutism.
That’s not whataboutism. I’m showing the hypocrisy in one rule being justified, but not the other, so as to argue more effectively against the age rule. Whataboutism is when you change the subject.
So it’s okay to have a constitutionally-mandated age requirement, but not a no-treason requirement?
In the mirror situation, Trump would’ve just had the opposing court justices assassinated and then installed puppets that would rule that those assassinations were official acts.
This was how my relatively modern laptop with an HDD ran when it had Windows 10 (which it came with). The main difference was that it was closer to 5-10 minutes.
I switched to Linux and the problem went away. Funny how that works.
They’re not a troll, they’re just being sarcastic.
That would definitely help a lot. It wouldn’t be perfect, but at least some people’s votes wouldn’t be worth 3x more than others.
Who’s Dessalines? The name sounds familiar, but I can’t remember much else.
It’s absolutely insane that we have to talk about winning swing states instead of just having everyone’s voice matter and vote count equally. Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and his presidency was illegitimate. We will never have a functioning democracy as long as we have the electoral college.
It literally happened in the US with period tracker app data getting subpoenaed in a state with an abortion ban.
If Microsoft was a smaller company, this would completely ruin them and the next headline would be them declaring bankruptcy after failing to fight off 50,000 lawsuits. Fortunately for them, laws don’t apply to companies their size.
The issue then is that all the investors that have already bought a ton of places can still leave them empty.
Firefox can open PDFs and I’m not sure about the desktop versions, but the Android version is 117MB.
You can bet your ass they paid a lot of money to get their malware on your computer. It should be illegal to load consumer hardware with 3rd party bloatware that can’t be removed.
The way it was explained to me was that regardless of gender, if you see someone in the woods, there might be other people nearby and they might pose a serious threat to you. Bears don’t really gang up on people, so you should be okay if you keep your distance.
I don’t know whether or not I agree with that risk assessment, but I can see that it comes from a logical standpoint.
Everyone else:
“Pardon me, do you have the time?”
“OH MY GOD A TALKING DODO BIRD!”
You need more data to recognize frames, but not a lot more data. A hash for each quality setting would be sufficient as long as they don’t start fuzzing the videos, which would be very expensive on their part.
It’s illegal to not identify an ad as an ad (unless you’re a movie maker, but that’s a different topic). All ad blockers need to do is read that indicator. That might not be super simple, but I have faith in the abilities of the brilliant people behind many ad-blocking technologies.
Why do you feel the need to make such statements regarding the motivation without any source or evidence to back them up?