• 11 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle










  • yea, it’s also just up to 160

    using grayjay to download wham:last christmas gives us up to 134kbps opus. which is fine, it’s the official channel and all, so upload is pretty good.

    Just talking, is more like 118kbps, a gresham lecture came in at that.

    Opus is variable, which is pretty good. saves bandwith and all.

    also to point out, youtube reencodes a lot of videos, so the older it is - the more likely it has been re-encoded. and youtube is not encoding from an old master file.

    Point is, totally agree on the generational thing, which you (mostly) avoids with spotify.

    it’s good enough for most audio setups if you find the decent audio on youtube first







  • Usually, a better way to help an ecosystem balance itself is to reintroduce predators or similarly.

    the deer population in yellowstone was destroying the soil, this was solved by reintroducing wolves.

    there’s a big difference between this, and f.ex castrating a lot of the deer, or going on a shooting spree.

    It also goes with the assumption that the ecosystem is either outside the moral spectrum, or morally good.


  • I’m not a fan of utalitarianism myelf, so this might be wrong; this sounds like utalitarianism - as the action you did cause other suffering.

    then in your moral philosophy, are all actions that cause suffering (and joy, and all other feelings a human can experience) morally wrong?

    Is then not dating, f.ex Morally wrong?

    Or is it the impossibility of consent? Yes, a child is unable to consent to being born. Just as we are all unable to consent to the world being created, or nature’s whims. I cannot consent to a state on the other side of the world making policies, but I can still react and do things about it.

    Is it morally wrong to let animals have children?