

That would be the Aeon.


That would be the Aeon.


Couldn’t agree more. For us Linux gamer there’s a set of scripts that enable FAF for us (haven’t tried).
Wiki at least says: “It has been under development since 1990 by the GNU Project of the Free Software Foundation”.
Let’s see where this leads. They have not managed so far to get GNU/Hurd production ready in the 35 years it’s been in development.


Also the EU voted against chat control.
They did not. It was just removed from the agenda for now.


No one else then the parties messaging can see that the communication even occurs.


The classical “think of the children” argument. They truly are desperate to keep their walled garden. The EU is doing the right thing.
They said text stop but didn’t say where to.


Agreed.


You might want check your dns record

10.0.0.0/8 ip addresses are not publicly routable.
Domain registration information is public and accessible via whois. If your domain registrar has privacy services use them. They usually mean that instead of your name etc it will display the info of the privacy proxy.
The annoyance is no notifications
Not true. I have GrapheneOS with no Google blobs in a profile where I have Signal from play store (via Aurora) and notifications work perfectly. Signal itself will turn on the no google mode for notifications if not available.


They were already losing before MS bought them.


You should be able to do it in all androids.


Personally, I absolutely hate the /e/OS launcher. It reminds me too much of iOS. And I honestly hate it.
You can install whatever launcher you want. No need to stay on the default (don’t like it either). One of my old phones has /e/os and I’m using Zim Launcher.
Arbitration typically tends not to be as neutral as a court. A court will always look how laws apply in a particular case. Arbitration may not do that. Arbitration takes power away from the consumer. Arbitration is not a court of law. It’s a dispute between an individual and a company. Don’t know how things are in Switzerland in this regard but I fear that it’s not as neutral as a court of law would be. Especially as the arbitrator is pre selected by the company.
Also in their TOS “No Class Arbitrations, Class Actions or Representative Actions.” i.e. if the company would screw over dozens of people they can only complain one by one even if they are all the same case. If a class action or class arbitration could occur the company screwing over dozens of people it could be viewed as a whole hence it might be determined that what they are doing is systematic, and if it would be in court it could be seen as illegal.
Disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer or any kind of legal expert.
In their TOS: “XVII. Dispute resolution by arbitration”
“Binding Arbitration. – you – waive your and NYM’s respective rights to have any and all Disputes arising from or related to these T&Cs resolved in a court.”
A big red flag.
Try filen.io. Similar concept as Dropbox but zero knowledge and encrypted. you can easily share direct (expiring (so you choose so)) links to files with or without password.