HuddaBudda

“Someone in NY with nothing to lose needs to take care of Merchan,” wrote one commentator on Patriots.Win. “Hopefully he gets met with illegals with a machete,” the post said in reference to illegal immigrants.

Imagine having so much to lose for your opinions, that you hope the people that you’ve oppressed carry out your sick fantasies.

On Gateway Pundit, one poster suggested shooting liberals after the verdict. “Time to start capping some leftys,” said the post. “This cannot be fixed by voting."

I feel like America is encouraging the wrong attitudes. When it arrests peaceful protestors on Gaza, but won’t touch the guys threatening to shoot up “leftys.”

True, but I imagine it’ll be hard to campaign across the nation with house arrest.

Combo guilty!

Guilty-Overkill!

Guiltrosicty

Guilt-a-mangaro

Penta-guilty!

So. Our democracy hinges on the fact that the lesser of two evils is being a clown, to protect a ICC criminal dictator, while innocent civilians die daily, and will for another 7 months, to American paid bombs.

I wonder if we can move to Canada based on political asylum from Trump. Because if not, we are so fucked.

If I have to hear one more thought Donald Trump has about this case.

I have blue balls for justice starting from 4 years ago. And nothing but Trump commentary (arguable the least horny thing on this planet) to keep me occupied.

And I am about to pay a porn star hush money to beat me in a Trump outfit if I don’t start seeing some justice.

“If I wasn’t a Libertarian before, I sure as hell am a Libertarian now.”

If Libertarian-ism was 180 degrees and a mile in the opposite direction. Dictators notoriously go after the liberals and libertarians first.

I wouldn’t use the government to jail people, I just wouldn’t do that

No. You’d send in the national guard to shoot them for merely expressing their discontent.

Maybe you don’t want to win. Keep getting your 3% every 4 years.

Win what? With Trump?

• Loss of abortion access?
• Loss of child tax credits?
• Loss of freedom of expression?
• Loss of library books?
• Loss of civil liberties?
• Loss of climate action?
• Loss of accountability to rapist and fraudsters?

If Trump is the win for the libertarian party, then I would prefer to lose.

I really don’t like that the sources on this article are missing.

Sure, that’s a lot of money for the wealthy who control 93% of stock, but it’s also tens of millions of Americans who will have a more comfortable and secure retirement. In fact, the number of Americans who have over $1 million in their retirement accounts grew by 20% in the last quarter of 2023.

Fine and dandy, except that half of Americans don’t have a retirement account. Or 47% of Americans.

So while retirement indexes are up, 1:2 people are not going to see that.

Inflation eased slightly in April — the first time this year that has happened. Overall inflation edged down to 3.4% and slipped to 3.6% when you exclude food and energy costs. (food expected to rise by an additional 2.2%)

Good to see the brakes are working. But just remember that not everyone goes out to by a car or house on a twice-a-week basis. But everyone does with the grocery store. Which in Biden’s defense, he has started trying to pull back.

Though effort =/= job done.

Looks at the entirety of the internet

Oh no.

That is… hilarious.

The jury haven’t even made a ruling yet… All they’ve done is listen…

“You are going into a kangaroo court. There’s nothing more. Nothing less. There’d be absolutely no reason, no justification to do that whatsoever.” - Donald Trump Jr.

Not even an excuse? , if the jury only has one side of the story that is what they are going with.

If you aren’t even going to put your fists up and spend all your time arguing with the referee, you can’t complain when you get KO’ed

If you go back in history more then Oct 7. You’ll find a lot of questions… like…

• That 4 billion we sent to Israel… that was supposed to go to defense from attacks such as this… where did it go?

• Why were the guards not even in armor before Hamas descended on them, even though there was an early warning?

• How did a government that was warned of the attack a month before it happened decide to do nothing about it?

• Why is Israel’s tactics not reflecting a hostage situation and more of a scorched-earth policy?

• Why did Israel shoot their own hostages that were waving White flags?

It’s not Israel’s pursuit of justice that disgusts people, it’s Israel’s deplorable tactics that is embarrassing both the US and Israel. Only Israel… doesn’t seemed to ashamed of them… While the US is burning global goodwill by the megaton.

So yes, both sides.

I don’t think you’ll find many people that don’t look at our current healthcare system as a wreck. People are paying $150-$300 a month for a coupon that takes 70% off their next hospital bill of $200,000.

A better message would be that Trump is coming for our Democracy.

But this current message lacks any perspective on our current healthcare system.

here is no equivalence - none - between Israel and Hamas.

A week ago he is saying that Israel may have used bombs to commit human rights violations, suddenly that evidence doesn’t exist?

Is the dementia hitting Biden that hard?

Those that make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable. - John F Kennedy 1962

I do hope no violence happens in Texas, I really do.

Though anyone who has picked up a history book knows how this ends. And usually forced to sit as a bystander as it happens.

they can consent to share their contact information “which the (Department of Health and Human Services) Secretary may use to conduct outreach via phone or email to follow up with users on additional resources.”

The bill doesn’t explain how this collected data would be handled or who would have access to it. Critics said that vagueness poses concerns for pregnant women’s privacy.

That is right, but also wrong.

A. Just because giving data is consensual, does not mean it can’t/won’t be used against you. “Anything you say or said will be used against you in a court of law”

B. There are no protections for this data. Who gets access to it?

This is a trap being masqueraded as helpful for women that are pregnant, when this is the same trap as “Life clinics” faking being abortion clinics.

This was a huge problem even when Trump was running.

It’s not like people tried to warn them, but I guess the idea that older generation that have a harder time moving around might actually want/need mail in ballots to vote.

You know, being considerate of your voters and such.

Possession of a controlled substance classified in Schedule III of the Drug Control Act, upon conviction, exposes the violator to a misdemeanor conviction for which the punishment is confinement in jail for up to twelve months and a fine up to $2,500, either or both.

I feel like I am missing a piece of the puzzle.

How does this legalize weed? This feel like the same thing as last time with less jail time.

7-2

I bet, can guess who those 2 were without even looking.

Justice Clarence Thomas reached back to the earliest days of the Constitution in his majority opinion to note that “the Bureau’s funding mechanism fits comfortably with the First Congress’ appropriations practice.”

Hmmm… surprising… maybe public pressure does work.

Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Thomas’ colleagues in the court’s conservative bloc, dissented. “The Court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight,” Alito wrote.

No more powerful then the billionaires that get to bribe officials and run the show.

“We have to know that sometimes people will open the door for you and leave it open,” the US vice-president said. “Sometimes they won’t, and then you need to kick that fucking door down.”

Whelp it’s decided, I am going to kick down a bank vault door. Because Harris said fucking.

/sarcasm

deleted by creator