_NoName_

Don’t forget it’s also inherently misogynistic and attacks cis women all the time anyways.

Yeah, it’s called a Widlerizer.

The process of collective disarming is the path towards growing past war. And that first step is the collective banning of manufacturing such weapons.

Richtig

Hello yes, I am normal man, do you like skateboards?

I saw a snippet of an interview he was in. The interviewer asked him “What was the last thing you did out in public by yourself?”.

Walz thought for a moment and said “I went to Menards and bought an air filter for my furnace.”

So we’re still in a limbo period with nothing actually on the market.

I know you’re correct, since there are now solid state batteries on the market which outperform liquid-electrolyte LiPo batteries, but just stating “we’re at the tipping point” without dropping any link as evidence makes your claim very unconvincing.

The first news I’ve heard is Yoshino power selling solid state power banks. here’s a video covering them.

Sacrilinux - or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, sacrilege + Lin…

It could in fact depict any forum, IRC, or organized online community.

When we’re talking about this kind of genetic manipulation, there’s two methods. Being able to meaningfully read a person’s genetic code (we do not understand the majority of a person’s genetic code due to a variety of issues), or basing your actions on individuals.

The individuals version has already been done, where we barred certain ‘undesirable’ individuals from reproducing. We know this one to explicitly only leads to evil implementations. It turns the practice of finding a romantic partner into a game of fusing two people together to get a better one.

The other method currently has two tools currently: selective IVF and CRISPR. Both of these are in their infancy, with how effective they are still being up in the air. These techniques require highly specialized professionals and are thus expensive. These will likely always be expensive even after they get cheaper. The world we live in where the rich can have “super-babies” with no genetic defects, while most poor children are still born naturally, is one where discrimination based on genetics is treated as rational, and based on lineages. That is fundamentally the creation of an evil world.

We’re also still ignoring the fact that we’re still pretty explicitly ableist as a culture. How do you think it’ll feel when a person who lives with a disability gets pressured into IVF “so the child doesn’t end up like you”. Blind people have a subculture, deaf and mute people have a subculture, most people living with disabilities find each other for solidarity and relatability. We call it ‘living with disabilities’, but they just call it ‘living’. We’re still treating these issues as if they’re something to wipe out rather than changing our culture and infrastructure to accommodate them.

deleted by creator

Eugenics is bad because it’s based on fundamentally incorrect ideas about how genetics plays into personal development. Galton drew specifically upon the fundamentally incorrect ideas of scientific racism, and wrote about Eugenics as being a means to better improve the superior races. Galton argued that things like poverty and mass suffering could have been solved this way, essentially arguing that it was the personal incompetence of the less fortunate which lead them into misfortune (also fundamentally incorrect).

Even if you drop the baggage of scientific racism, Eugenics is still conceptually ableist, choosing to eliminate those we deem disabled rather than finding solutions to better their lives.

On top of that, we were kind of hinging on sequencing the human genome giving us the insight to how genetic diseases work, the single possible case that eugenic thought might have had a use in. This has since fallen through. Further research into genetics has also demonstrated just how unreadable DNA is right now. We are still nowhere near being able to predict most genetic diseases based on the genetics of a couple.

I also cannot think of a single thing that eugenics implies should be done that isn’t absolutely evil. I’d argue that things that only encourage evil actions are themselves evil.

Didn’t know they put cuck chairs on trains /s

I like “xitter” (pronounced ‘shitter’)

I reckon that cornea there’s bumpier than a gnarled pebble judgin by the number of them there shimmers.

I’d hold off till we get testimonial from students (we already might have, AFAIK) and coaches in the rifle team before we turn “we have no record of it” into “it didn’t happen”.

The bullying thing’s already been covered so I won’t harp on that.

Stop watching WWE with them. They’re clearly imitating an pile driver elbow drop from the top of Hell in a Cell. /s

Edit: wow I really bungled that one. Elbow drop, not piledriver.

Say “dubdubdub” or “dubbadubdub”. “winwinwin” would also be acceptable.