The right of the people would be interpreted to be citizens 100% guaranteed.

I’ll bet you anything that doesn’t happen and ya take it up the ass.

You mean 4 and 6

Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.

So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.

I see a 7/10 in there that seems the most honest.

Doing so should automatically trigger a review, where losing again automatically means you lose your seat and a special election is called.

There isn’t, because you cannot prove a Lemmy user’s gender to enforce this. You can only moderate the content.

Likely with kid gloves

How about blocking this nonsense on Xbox? Need a pi hole yes?

None of that matters, as it’s a book… The problem is her as a person.

Honestly, no

Why no social connections? Best thing to do is to externally connect and have things outside the confines of your current unhappiness.

On the playground sure, but at some level it’s show the receipts first or get fucked up to discourage gish gallop. If we don’t preemptively shut it down, we’re in extreme danger.

There is no high ground

Trolley problem nuance, and morons are downvoting you

This is the correct answer in any single chain deterministic universe… It always happened just like that.

To add to the other comment, the two concepts of an afterlife and punishment or reward are separate concepts and don’t have to coincide. Some faiths explicitly believe in heaven and not hell, and some neither.

Always remember when thinking about possibilities, given totally made up shit, the answer is always all possibilities exist and must be considered.

Why? We aren’t taking care of our people. I’m sure many of them feel the same way or close. Lots of people don’t want to live in misery, especially when they realize most of it is an actively created construct by others. If you combine that with the very common belief in an afterlife, it becomes a very obvious and likely path.

There are certain kinds of rules and discoveries that society can make that they must defend by making rules that eliminate anyone that dares bring the adverse ruling up again. You want slavery and propose it back into law? Society kills you for that.

Correct despite downvotes