

Yes, it is legal. There are many christians in Saudi Arabia, for example. What is usually illegal is public religious practices of religions other than Islam.
Decentralise everything!
Yes, it is legal. There are many christians in Saudi Arabia, for example. What is usually illegal is public religious practices of religions other than Islam.
Not making sure the result even makes sense. There was a real example, where a ~2010 news article said that the number of crimes in their city has been doubling every year since ~1980.
That is not possible. Assume that there was one crime in 1980. In 2010, there must be at least 2^20 crimes.
Hypocrisy! Someone is committing hypocrisy at the church on 325289 ave!
That’s it exactly. JBP, JD Vance, etc., play word games of rhetoric to get what they want. It’s like they are defence lawyers and morality is a legal system they are trying to game - they argue whatever just to win.
I dont think so, but I would love one
Oh. Actually that clarifies alot.
Facilitate is the key word. The SC judge left it to the fedral judge to define what it means, taking into account impact on foreign policy.
So, it is not necessarily just an empty word.
I would love that here
My background in is in Islam, not Christianity. This doesn’t answer your question but I hope it is helpful.
Most opinions in Islam are that: it is not a sin to read pagan texts or texts from other religions, but it is highly discouraged for non-experts in Islam, as, for example, it may weaken their belief in Islam. Many Muslim prostelyzers, for example, extensively read non-Islamic texts to help them convert other people to Islam.
However, I think a distinction is usually made between mythical texts and religious texts. Many believe that it is no sin to read Greek mythology because they see them as just fixtional stories, but that it is a sin or it is discourged to read the Torah or the Bible.
Omg youre the expert I am looking for! I would like to DIY an internet router that can communicate with whales.
And apparently a mural… which was vandalized in February
I hate you for this
Excuse my ignorance. Could someone elaborate?
Does this include HB-1?
/s
You know what China should do? Ban all exports to the US. Wtf you gonna tariff now, bitch?
Paused to wait for what? What is going to change as time passes?
Yes, billionaires could end poverty. But they never did and never will.
Keep in mind that tapes are still the most efficient storage medium, in terms of both cost and physical space used. What they lack is speed. These characteristics make them the perfect medium for archiving and backup.
To add: there’s no way money can be saved by switching to another medium. Switching to HDDs, SSDs, etc will be many times more expensive, and switching to cloud would be much more expensive over the long run. It’s unclear whether he wants to move existing data to other mediums (very expensive and stupid - the tapes are already there and have almost no upkeep) or just new data (slightly less stupid).
I agree, but what is the alternative? I mean, is there a neutral way to get new supreme court justices?
(Honestly askibg)
Whether they are appealing or not, this sounds like the administration is breaking the law. The ruling to allow AP doesn’t stop taking effect if an appeal is in process.
The Trump Administration keeps abusing that. They appeal something, and just do whatever they want until the appeal is processed.