This is hilariously wrong. The reality is they can use biometrics to open it without a warrant. They can and will force you to unlock it with a warrant.
Any lawyers reading this post are either cackling or bashing their head into a brick wall.
I would guess this is the case everywhere. If there was, “I don’t want to give you evidence” loophole so many people would walk away no problem. I mean, this literally how Alex Jones lost. They refused to comply with discovery so the judge said you lose, let’s go to the judgement phase. There was no trial.
It’s not. This reply is incredibly naive. They can compel you to give the password to your phone, why wouldn’t they be able to compel you to give the password to your encryption? There’s a reason so many cases are solved via phone contents even though that’s “testifying against yourself”. If they have a warrant and you refuse you’ll definitely be charged with obstruction. Also in court there’s a concept where if you refuse to provide evidence the court/jury is instructed to assume that it’s as bad as it can possibly be, making sure you’re going to lose.
This is the most hypocritical post in the history of the Internet.
Are you actually a raving lunatic who doesn’t pay any attention to what people say or is this some elaborate troll job?
What an absolute incel.
I’m in it for the gaming stuff. The prorprietary nvidia drivers were the big seller. That and kde.
Welp, I’m currently downloading Bazzite to replace Kubuntu. Let’s hope it goes better than Manjaro did.
Making eye contact with any man at a urinal is a WILD scenario. If there’s a mirror in front of one I wouldn’t make eye contact with myself. What bars are you at where the urinals are positioned so they face the center of the room?!
And who, exactly, is going to be running these trials? The same group that didn’t prosecute any crimes for 4 years last time?
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.