They wouldn’t? Trump didn’t get more votes than 2020. Kamala just got far less than Biden.
They wouldn’t? Trump didn’t get more votes than 2020. Kamala just got far less than Biden.
Most phone calculators lack things like graphs, statistical tests, etc. Really just for people who are quired to use Ti calculators or learned to use them in the past. Better apps imo exist (like numworks graphing calculator) if you don’t have platform loyalty
You can vote for someone against genocide for pres or just not vote for any candidate and still vote downballot.
If the downballot candidate hasn’t been actively assisting genocide and hasn’t been very publicly celebrating that, it probably helps with getting votes.
Would have been a lot easier to type this comment while squatting if I had a standing desk capable of squating instead of using my lap for my notebook
Did McCain vote for Trump?
But he insulted others. He hardly was as vitriolic towards his base demographic.
Spending the first like 2 months campaigning on how she doesn’t care about certain demographics’ vote (primarily arab and college-age voters, and avoiding any popular policy discussion (only focusing on ways they were shifting further right) until the week of election probably didn’t help. Trump got the majority of 1st time voters this cycle. Biden got 64%.
And, just like her campaign, her voters did little but try to insult people. What a surprise… insulting people doesn’t convince people to vote for you or your candidate.
Silverchase’s comment is a trick to prevent you from finding out how tasty switch cartridges are.
But I mentioned that and the fartographer said “No”.
Why would middling underperformers be willing to pay $1000’s for a job that pays worse than for the same job but paying more? You think that lady would have said “no, I don’t want this job anymore because the pay increased”?
If it paid better, wouldn’t more people try to bribe their way into the job? Granted, they’re have more real competition for the jobs, so just getting certified might not be good enough to get a job.
Its only a crime if you make it a crime. Not saying the courts should be deciding that; election law should. If the system is designed to just not double count votes and use whatever the last cast ballot says, then there’s no issue with casting another ballot, so why should it be a crime to cast 2 or 3 ballots?
The ridiculously nerdy explanation is comedy itself
Even if he did get a second ballot and casted it, that should be on the system to deal with. As long as there’s not attempted fraud (ie: impersonating another person/fake ID, multiple identities, etc). Voting a second time could also just be an attempt to change your vote and invalidate the original ballot as well and now that digital systems are widespread, it would be a relatively easy thing to do.
The basic idea seems to be that it should be pretty similar to reddit, but with federation. Definitely still seems to have its own separate character though. And different instances have their own unique cultures, some more differentiated than others.
If pineapple juice is anything like other citric juices, at least the sperm isn’t so acidic and has a relatively weak taste.
I wanna be the type of pirate that yells “SUPER!”
Its actually in the headline. Dr. Who recommended “Dementia Tests For Trump”
There was also the cost of running twitter. Granted, his return so far has been about 50 bil and twitter still has a market value of like 40 billion, so it’s not like that asset has gone away. Like 4 billion in net costs to make 50 billion in two years is pretty solid return on investment…